Showing : 3671-3680 of 5795 Results

FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, HARYANA
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Haryana Ceiling on Lands Holdings Act, 1972, Section 9(3)-- Land sold after appointed day 24.1.1971 but before coming into force of Haryana Ceiling Act on 23.12.1972-Sold area has necessarily to be included in permissible area of landowner...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977, Section 30, 15-- Reservation of plots, discretionary quota-Government can give directions to HUDA provided such reservation is within the parameters, scheme and objects of the Act-Government cannot give directions inconsistent with the Act-Directions given by Government must not only be consistent with provisions..........
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, HARYANA
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Act, Section 34, 35, 36, 37-- Instructions issued by Director of Land Records Haryana vide Letter No. 5498 dated 15.5.1992, in view of Haryana Amendment Act 9 of 1992-Mutation sanctioned of Shamlat Deh land in favour of Gram Panchayat-Haryana Amendment Act 9 of 1992 declared ultra vires by Division Bench in Jai Singh's case..........
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, HARYANA
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Haryana Ceiling on Lands Holdings Act, 1972, Section 8(1), 12(3)-- Land declared surplus under Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act-Remained unutilised under the Punjab Act-Land in excess of permissible area transferred before 30.7.1958-Became protected from being declared surplus after coming into force of Haryana Ceiling Act-Could not have got vested in State..........
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, HARYANA
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Haryana Ceiling on Lands Holdings Act, 1972, Section 8(1), 12(3)-- Query-Area declared surplus under Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act-Before landowner has opportunity to object against utilisation or take legal recourse for getting it excluded from surplus pool-Surplus area gets vested in State Government on 23.12.1972 when Haryana Ceiling Act came into force..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1997
Details
East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, Section 42, 23A, 18, 3-- Re-partition of Bachat land-Land in dispute reserved for a common purpose by applying a pro rata cut-Owners continued to be owners-Only management passed over in Gram Panchayat-No land can be reserved for income of Gram Panchayat by applying pro rata cut on the proprietors of land during..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1997
Details
East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, Section 18, 3-- Land reserved for a common purpose by applying a pro rata cut-After land utilised for common purpose for which it was reserved-Unutilised land is known as Bachat land. Editorial Note.-1995 PLJ 496 UPHELD...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Ad interim injunction - Stay of execution of decree - Valid award passed under the provisions of Forest Act - Civil Court set aside award on compromise between the owner of the land and the Conservator of Forest who had no authority from the State Government - State filing a suit for declaration..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Haryana Ceiling on Lands Holdings Act, 1972, Section 16, 12-- Objection about valuation of land - Notice to landowner-Only necessary after amount determined and required to be disbursed for the purposes of apportionment...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 122, Contract Act, 1872, Section 16, 14-- Gift - Undue influence - Burden of proof or onus probandi - House property let out by plaintiff - donor to village panchayat - Donee who was only occupying part of property as employee of tenant was not in a position to dominate and influence will of plaintiff - donor - Plaintiff an illiterate..........

Showing : 3671-3680 of 5795 Results