Showing : 41-50 of 1245 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 28, Punjab Land Revenue (Lambardari) Rules, 1908, Rule 15, 16-- Appointment of Lambardar - There is no force and merit in submissions, as drive for empowering women is in full swing - People would have more confidence in case office of lambardar is represented by woman - It has been case where illiterate persons are more intelligent than literate ones - It is..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 9-- Jurisdiction of civil Court - Mutation case on the basis of registered Will - Even if mutation case is decided against the plaintiffs and they raise a claim on the basis of same registered will, before regular Courts, Regular Courts would have jurisdiction to determine the issue without being..........
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38-- Permanent injunction - Restraining defendants from disturbing possession of plaintiffs - Relief in part granted as Revenue Authority granted mutation of part of land - No reasons given by Revenue Authority for not granting mutation of remaining property - Bonafide purchase of entire property by..........
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Registration Act, 1908, Section 71-- Refusal to register - Sale deed - Specific reasons are required to be recorded for rejection of document, if any, after due application of mind in accordance with law taking into account the circulars and guidelines issued by Revenue and Land Reforms Department - Since impugned endorsement on the..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 37, 38-- Injunction - To restrain defendants from interfering in peaceful possession - Plaintiff claiming title and possession over suit land on the basis of Will - Will not seen the light of day for about ten years - Will not disclosed even during earlier litigation pertaining to same land nor produced..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Punjab Occupancy Tenants (Vesting of Population Rights) Act, 1953, Section 5-- Plaintiff were not recorded as occupancy tenants in revenue record at commencement of Act - Plaintiff had not acquired occupancy rights by way of agreement - Plaintiff are alleging that they had acquired status of occupancy tenants u/S.5(2) of Act on ground that they are in possession of land in..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Punjab Occupancy Tenants (Vesting of Population Rights) Act, 1953, Section 5-- Two conditions are required to declare as occupancy tenants are: (i) Tenant should have been in possession for continuous 30 years in land in dispute; (ii) Tenant should not have paid rent for land beyond amount of land revenue thereof and rates and cess for time being charageable thereon...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 4, 5(1)(d)-- Illegal gratification - It is evident that there is no evidence of demand except statement of complainant who is the interested witness - Nobody has heard conversation between accused and complainant at the time when money was given to accused - Hence, there is no confirmation that said amount was..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Article 58, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34-- Suit for declaration of ownership - Limitation - Plaintiffs came to know about wrong revenue entries qua suit land in January 1994, which furnished them cause of action to file the suit - Suit filed in April 1994, is therefore, within limitation after accrual of cause of action in favour of..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Himachal Pradesh Land Revenue Act, 1954, Section 32-- Entries in revenue record - Suit for declaration - Name of father of plaintiff was recorded as tenant in khasra Girdwari - Revenue officials wrongly mentioned the name of defendant no.1 as Gair Mourusi - However, admittedly there is no lawful order of revenue Officer authorizing such change in..........

Showing : 41-50 of 1245 Results