Showing : 41-50 of 995 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Rules, 1908, Rule 14, 15, 17-- Appointment of Lambardar - Interference with choice of Collector - Commissioner as well as Financial Commissioner did not record any finding that order passed by Collector was suffering from patent illegality or perversity - Held, unless such finding was recorded by Commissioner or Financial..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Rules, 1908, Rule 14, 15, 17-- Appointment of Lambardar - Validity - Respondent No.2 was defaulter of payment of bills of Public Health Department from June, 2000 till September, 2006 - Proceedings to fill up post in question were initiated in month of April, 2005 - Deposit of amount after Collector appointing petitioner as..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 111, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Partition proceedings - Ex parte decree - Setting aside of - Held, no body should be condemned unheard - In present case, Assistant Collector, 1st Grade violated basic rule of audi alterm parterm while passing ex-parte order - Revenue authorities i.e. Collector, Commissioner as well as Financial..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Rules, 1908, Rule 14, 15, 16-- Appointment of Lambardar - Petitioner has colluded with concerned official(s), who conducted proclamation in a clandestine manner so as to ensure that there would be no contest and petitioner would be appointed as Lambardar - Held, such an unhealthy practice is not permissible in law - Order..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent) Recovery Act, 1973, Section 4, 5, 7-- Eviction - Unauthorized occupation - Public premises - Order passed by Assistant Collector 1st Grade holding that Municipal Committee is not owner of premises in dispute - Order attained finality - Not so far challenged by Municipal Council - Held, it is difficult to hold that law would permit..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Rules, 1908, Rule 15-- Appointment of Lambardar - Choice of Collector - Held, ordinarily, choice of Collector, in cases of appointment of Lambardar, should not be interfered with by higher revenue authorities - Although it is not an absolute rule, yet choice of Collector would be interfered with only when same is found..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Rules, 1908, Rule 15-- Appointment of Lambardar - Validity - Held, once after remand, appellant had been granted ample opportunity to raise all pleas before Financial Commissioner, then question of merit having not been considered by Collector and Commissioner does not arise - Authorities have found respondent No.5 more..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Rules, 1908, Rule 15-- Appointment of Lambardar - Validity - Collector has considered each and every material aspect of the matter including comparative merits of candidates - Respondent No.5 was recommended by all lower revenue authorities for appointment to post of Lambardar as recorded by Collector in his order -..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 2(g)(iia)-- Shamlat deh - Exclusion from - Gram Panchayat has been held to be owner of entire land but 76 acres out of this land has been excluded on ground that department has erected infrastructure and established farm etc. - Held, once it has been held that entire land including 76 acres is `Shamilat Deh',..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 13, 16, 34-- Mutation proceedings - Transfer of case - Validity - Held, justice should not only be done but it should also appear to have been done - No litigating party should be forced to go home with a grouse that he/she did not get fair trial or due opportunity to plead the case - In present case, when..........

Showing : 41-50 of 995 Results