Showing : 51-60 of 995 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 13, 16, Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226, 227-- Writ petition - Alternative remedy - Petitioner has not availed his alternative remedy and that too without any reason - Held, petitioner was under legal obligation to exhaust his alternative remedy available to him before filing present writ petition - Petition dismissed...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Rules, 1908, Rule 15-- Appointment of Lambardar - Validity - Comparative merits of petitioner as well as of respondent No.4 have been duly considered and rightly appreciated by revenue authorities while passing impugned order - Respondent No.4 was found having more land holding, better contribution to State in form of..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Rules, 1908, Rule 15-- Appointment of Lambardar - Choice of Collector - Held, ordinarily, choice of Collector, in cases of appointment of Lambardar, should not be interfered with by higher revenue authorities - Although it is not an absolute rule, yet choice of Collector would be interfered with only when same is found..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 111-- Partition - Correction of khasra girdwari - Petitioner was neither owner nor co-sharer of land - Held, petitioner had no locus standi to file application for correction of khasra girdawari...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue (Lambardari) Rules, 1908, Rule 15, 16-- Appointment of Lambardar - Petitioner 52 years of age and graduate whereas respondent No.5 more than 62 years of age and matriculate - Petitioner engaged in his profession i.e. agriculture including dairy farming which goes in his favour because he would be readily available in village as and when..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue (Lambardari) Rules, 1908, Rule 15, 16-- Appointment of Lambardar - Choice of Collector - Interference - Held, it is settled principle of law that ordinarily choice of Collector is not to be interfered with - However, it is not an absolute rule, particularly when orders passed by Collector or/and by higher revenue authorities are found..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 34, 35, 36, 37-- Sanction of mutation - Petitioner and respondent No.5 claiming entire land left behind by deceased on the basis of Will - Deceased was having four daughters also - Neither petitioner nor respondent No.5 impleaded them in mutation proceedings - Reference made by Assistant Collector, in his order..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, Section 18, 23A-- Common purposes - Reservation of land - Presumption as to - Held, S.18 and 23-A of the Act place statutory duty on consolidation officer where there is no Shamilat Deh or Shamilat Deh in village is insufficient to apply pro rata cut on holdings of proprietors and reserve land for Panchayat and for..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue (Lambardari) Rules, 1908, Rule 15, 16-- Appointment of Lambardar - Before setting aside orders passed by Collector and Divisional Commissioner, FC did not point out any patent illegality or perversity in either of orders passed by lower revenue authorities - Held, in absence of any such findings recorded by FC there was no scope for..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Revenue (Lambardari) Rules, 1908, Rule 15, 16-- Appointment of Lambardar - Involvement in criminal case - Effect - Held, once petitioner has been acquitted about 20 years back, coupled with given circumstances of present case, involvement of petitioner in criminal case cannot stand in his way by any stretch of imagination - Thus, impugned order..........

Showing : 51-60 of 995 Results