Showing : 1-10 of 496 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Madhya Pradesh Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1960, Section 41, 42- - Determination of surplus land - Plaintiff contended that since he divorced his wife much before coming into force of Act, property inherited by his wife not to be considered to be holding of family - However, concurrent findings of fact on record that there was no customary divorce between..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 9-- Jurisdiction of civil Court - Orders passed by authorities under Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, declaring land to be surplus is without issuing notice to plaintiffs, who became owner in 1974 - Said order was wholly perverse and against principal of natural justice - In such circumstances,..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Haryana Utilisation of Surplus and Other Areas Scheme, 1976-- Clause 12 - Sale of allotted land - Resumption of land on account of no, payment of due instalments - Land allotted to allottee `B' by successors-i, interest - `B' will become owner of property only after paying entire instalments and after issuance of sale certificate by State and not merely on..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Urban Lands (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, Section 10(5), Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999, Section 3(2)(a)-- Surplus land - Vesting in State Government - All requisite actions contemplated under the act taken in accordance with law well before the enactment of Repeal Act and surplus vacant land stood vested with the State Government - If any transfer of property in question is effected, such transfer..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961, Section 16(3)(i), Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Rules, 1963, Rule 19-- Pre-emption application - Non-compliance of R.19 and Form L.C. 13 of Rules 1963 - Appellant deposited ten percent of purchase money as required u/s 16(3)(i) of Act - Merely because appellant deposited the amount under wrong head, he cannot be no, suited and defeat the benevolent object of S.16(3)..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Surplus Area -- Out of total area declared surplus in hands of big land owner, State authorities could take possession only qua land measuring 8 kanals 19 marla - Possession of remaining land measuring 13 kanal 3 marlas remained with petitioners - It was admitted that remaining area i.e. 13 Kanals 3 marlas could..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Land Reforms Act, 1972, Section 9(i), 9(ii)-- Surplus area - Petitioner challenged order of authorities u/s.9(i) and 9(ii) passed under the Act taking possession of his surplus land - No averment that he was either not heard before passing impugned order or that said order was challenged & if so to what effect - Held, petitioner cannot be..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953, Section 18, Punjab Land Reforms Act, 1972, Section 15-- Permissible area - Rights of tenant - Held, land declared tenant's permissible area stands "utilized" and "vested" on date of its declaration as tenant's permissible area - Any subsequent transfer of land comprised in tenant's permissible area or death of landowner or coming into force of the 1972..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Disposal of Surplus Rural Evacuee Agricultural Land Rules, 1962, Rule 11-- Auction sale - Validity - Description of property as plot No.S.1 is recorded in Form S.XX - Absence of khasra numbers particularly when property is duly identified as plot No.S.1 - Held, it does not indicate such an error as empowered Settlement Commissioner to set aside auction while exercising..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Haryana Utilisation of Surplus and Other Areas Scheme, 1976-- Para.5(5) - Surplus land - Allotment - Validity - Held, once prescribed authority failed to comply with relevant provisions of law contained in Para.5(5) of Scheme of 1976, allotment order in favour of father of petitioners was without jurisdiction...........

Showing : 1-10 of 496 Results