LawMirror.com

Results of leave to defend

Showing : 81-90 of 250 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Section 14(1)(e), 25B - - Eviction - NRI Landlord - Bona fide need - Leave to defend - Landlord resident of UK - Ownership not disputed - Both petitioner and his wife are aged 84 and 82 years respectively - Admitted position that landlord regularly visits India - In fact he spends half year in India i.e. during extreme cold and harsh winter..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 37, Rule 3(5), 7 -- Recovery suit - Leave to defend - Triable issue - Letter of credit - Defendant Bank failed to inform plaintiff regarding acceptance or refusal of document within prescribed period of time - Thus, there was clear violation of provisions under Uniform Custom and Practice for Documentary Credits (UCP500) especially with..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Section 14(1)(e), 25B(4) -- Eviction petition - Leave to defend - Application for rejection of - Validity - Along with application for leave to defend an affidavit is filed wherein it is stated that accompanying application may be read as part and parcel of affidavit and contents of accompanying application are not reflected therein for sake..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Section 14(1)(e) -- Bona fide need - Eviction petition - Leave to defend - Bona fide need of landlord has been clearly admitted which was need of grandsons to carry out their business activity from demised shop - They have no other "suitable alternate" accommodation available to carry out their business activity - Held, need is genuine - No..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B, 2(dd) -- Eviction - NRI landlord - Leave to contest - Contention of tenant that persons who have not acquired Indian citizenship cannot obtain to a Non-resident Indian status - Held, contention is directly against definition of "Non-Resident Indian" under the Act - All that is required u/s. 2(dd) is that person..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B -- Eviction - NRI landlord - Leave to defend - Contention of tenant that landlords have been living away from India for a long time and there is no reason for them to return to India in evening years of their lives - Held, if landlord declares that he requires premises for his personal occupation and intends to come..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (As extended to the city of Chandigarh), 1974, Section 13B - - Eviction - Personal need - NRI landlord - Eviction of tenant sought on ground of own personal need - Status of landlord as NRI is not in dispute - Contention of tenant is that in possession of only ground floor and building has two other storey and landlord wants..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (As extended to the city of Chandigarh), 1974, Section 13B - - Eviction - NRI landlord - Leave to defend - Defence of tenant that power of attorney holder does not have a power to institute case - Held, it is not uncommon that NRI landlord resorts to Court through a local resident Indians to prosecute case and to that extent..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (As extended to the city of Chandigarh), 1974, Section 13B - - Eviction - NRI landlord - Leave to defend - Summary adjudication - Held, a summary adjudication in application to leave to defend is an intervention by a Court to see whether there exists something tenable for consideration and statutory provision providing for a..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 37, Rule 1, 3 -- Leave to defend - Suit for recovery of sum based on promissory note - Defendant No.1 applied for education loan and defendants Nos.2 and 3 were co-borrower and guarantor - Defendant No.4 is training providing company - Record produced shows that no training imparted by the fourth defendant to the first defendant and..........

Showing : 81-90 of 250 Results