Showing : 1211-1220 of 3215 Results

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Section 22, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 9-- Preferential right to acquire property - Necessary parties - Property devolving upon more than two Class I heirs - Any one proposing to transfer - Preferential right to acquire is available to all other Class I legal heirs - All class I heirs are necessary parties in case of a suit for enforcement..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Section 22-- Preferential right to acquire property - Right recognized u/s 22 of the Act is a right available to Class I heirs - In case Class I heirs during their life time do not exercise their right of preferential purchase or no proposal for sale of the interest of the other Class I heir is made during the..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987-- Chapter VIA - Permanent Lok Adalat - Objection and scope - Alternative institutional mechanism in Chapter VI-A with regard to the disputes concerning public utility service is intended to provide an affordable, speedy and efficient mechanism to secure justice - By not making applicable the Code..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987-- Chapter VIA - Permanent Lok Adalat - Does not deprive the user or consumer of public utility service of an opportunity to have the dispute adjudicated by a civil court or a forum created under special statute - Permanent Lok Adalats are in addition to and not in derogation of a fora provided..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, Section 22C(8)-- Power conferred on Permanent Lok Adalats to adjudicate the disputes between the parties concerning public utility service upto a specific pecuniary limit, if they do not relate to any offence, as provided u/s 22-C(8), is not unconstitutional - An authority empowered to adjudicate the disputes..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987-- Validity - Permanent Lok Adalats under the Act (As amended by 2002 Amendment Act) are in addition to and not in derogation of Fora provided under various statues - Instead of ordinary civil courts, if other institutional mechanisms are set up or arrangements are made by Parliament with an..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, Section 22E-- Right of appeal - Not an inherent right - It is a statutory right - Non provision of appeal does not render a provision unconstitutional...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, Section 22-- Permanent Lok Adalat - Comprising of Judicial as well as non Judicial members - Such composition is not violative of principles of fairness and justice and is not contrary to Articles 14 & 21 of the Constitution of India...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 5-- Substitution of L.R's. - Enquiry - Jurisdiction of trial court - Trial court while conducting enquiry U.O.22.R.5 CPC held that petitioner had legally failed to prove the wills relied upon by him for the purpose of representing the estate of deceased - Held, trial court was not at all called upon..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 4(a), (b), 19, Order 39, Rule 1, 7- - Registered design - Infringement - Interim injunction - Much prior to application for registration of design was made, there were exchange of notice and issuance of legal notices between plaintiff company and defendant company in respect of same product dates and packing method etc. - Design in..........

Showing : 1211-1220 of 3215 Results