Showing : 1161-1170 of 2618 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Limitation - Insurance claim - Repudiation - Final decision about the repudiation was conveyed on 28.7.1994 - Till then the appellant kept on dangling a carrot of hope before the respondent that matter regarding repudiation of claim was being considered afresh - The complaint made on 6.8.994 would..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay of 589 days in filing appeal before Division Bench, against order passed by Single Judge - Averments in application constituting sufficient cause for not preferring appeal within period of limitation - Appeal allowed subject to payment of costs...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Limitation - Telephone disconnection - On 13.8.1993 - Complaint filed in the year 2000 - No amount of correspondence or meeting will extend the period of limitation - District Forum erred in not dealing with this question - State Commission dealt it too perfunctorily - The complaint was clearly..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Revision - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Delay of 117 days - Ground that the Counsel engaged by the petitioner an old man was unavailable for nearly 90 days on account of some personal difficulty - Held this is hardly acceptable - Not persuaded to condone the delay on the..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 18-- Acknowledgement - Time barred debt - Debtor can always agree to pay a time barred debt for which no consideration is required - Promise to pay time barred debt can always be considered as a valid contract...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay - Condonation - Sufficient cause - S.5 does not lay down any standard or objective test - The test of 'sufficient cause' is purely an individualistic test - It is not an objective test - No two cases can be treated alike - Sufficient cause is not defined in Limitation Act - Court to decide..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay - While deciding an application for condonation of delay Court ought not to go into merits of the case - At that stage Court has to see whether there is sufficient cause to condone the delay...........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b)-- Revision - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Application for - Stagewise day to day delay in pursuing the matter at different levels for filing revision not explained - No sufficient justification given by the petitioner so as to condone the delay in filing the revision - Application rejected..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Contract Act, 1872, Section 28, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 44-- Parties are entitled to provide a period of limitation shorter than that prescribed under Limitation Act...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Contract Act, 1872, Section 28, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 44-- Breach of contract - Limitation - Parties fixing limitation to file claim in case of breach of contract within 12 months - Claim not filed within the stipulated period - Claim filed beyond 12 months is time barred - Contention that under Limitation Act a period of three years is prescribed and..........

Showing : 1161-1170 of 2618 Results