Showing : 31-40 of 84 Results

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Article 135-- Execution - Limitation - Decree modified by appellate Court - Limitation to file execution commences only from the date of the judgment and decree of the Appellate Court...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Article 135, 136-- Execution - Decree for mandatory injunction and possession - Execution of decree for possession does not become infructuous or inexecutable merely because decree for mandatory injunction is barred by limitation...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, Article 137-- Injury or damage suffered in execution of decree - Limitation is three years - Suit filed beyond period of three years is not maintainable - Delay cannot be condoned by invoking S.5 Limitation Act...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Article 123-- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Thumb impressions of some body else on summons - Trial Court set aside the ex parte decree by holding it to be the result of fraud - Decree passed in 1980 but application to set aside it filed in 1997 when served in execution petition - Certified copy of decree..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 12(1), 5, Article 136, General Clauses Act, 1897, Section 9-- Decree - Execution - Limitation - Date of decree is to be excluded when computing period of limitation for execution of decree...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 54, Order 20, Rule 18, Limitation Act, 1963, Article 136, 137-- Application to send decree and papers to Collector to carry out partition - Not an application for execution - Since it is not an application for execution as such Articles 136 & 137 of Limitation Act are not applicable...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 2-- Adjustment - Not recorded within time - S.5 of Limitation Act is not applicable - Alleged compromise does not effect executability of the decree and execution is not liable to be struck off/dismissed on the basis of compromise...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Article 16, 20, Contract Act, 1872, Section 55-- Aggrement to sell - Suit for specific performance - Decreed - Appeal - Grant of decree for specifric performance objective on the ground of gross delay in filling of suit - Limitation of 3 years from the date fixed for execution of sale deed - suit filed within one year of last date of execution..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 20,, Rule 7, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section , Order 21-- Limitation Act, 1963, Article 136 - Execution of decree - Period of Limitation - Starting point - Suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession - Suit decreed by Trial Court - Appeal & Revision dismissed - No stay granted during pendency of appeal & revision - Limitation for execution..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 41, 146, Order 21, Rule 16, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section , Order 22, Rule 3, 4, 12, Succession Act, 1925-- Death of decree holder during pendency of execution - Continuation of execution by Legal Representative - Requirement of succession certificate - Money decree passed by Court in Madhya Pardesh - Decree transferred to Bhiwani - Objections by son of Judgment Debtor - Dismissed - Appeal - Decree..........

Showing : 31-40 of 84 Results