Showing : 2191-2200 of 2616 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Article 64-- Adverse possession - Suit for possession on basis of title and defendant was tenant/unauthorised occupant - Defendant raising plea that he is in possession for more than 30 years and plaintiff not landlord - Title not proved - Evidence that defendants predecessor accepted plaintiff as landlord by..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 18, 19, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 67-- Debt acknowledgment - Proof - Defendant denying execution - It is to be proved by the witness or by the person in whose presence the transaction did take place and who had seen the person signing the document or who had been well conversant and who had seen the executant signing the document - In..........
GUJARAT STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AHMEDABAD
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Limitation - Cause of action arose on 16.12.1993 - Complaint filed on 22.3.1996 - Complaint filed after lapse of around four months from the date on which the limitation expired for filing of complaint - Complainant did not move any application for condonation of delay before the District Forum -..........
GUJARAT STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AHMEDABAD
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Limitation - It is for the complainant to see that either he files the complaint within the period of limitation or he tenders explanation for having not filed the complaint within the period of limitation...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14-- To get benefit of S.14 the party seeking its benefit must fulfill the four conditions - (1) The plaintiff who filed the suit had been prosecuting another civil proceeding with due diligence; (2) The earlier proceeding resorted by the plaintiff was based on the same cause of action; (3) The former..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 14, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 103-- Prior to amendment - The benefit of the provision of S.14 of the Limitation Act can be extended to a suit filed by the plaintiff U.O.21.R.103 CPC as it stood before its 1976 amendment...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 152-- Application for correction of clerical error in decree - Words "at any time" in Section 152 - Makes it clear that no period of limitation prescribed - Article 136 Limitation Act does not apply to application for amendment of decree - Once Court finds that names of plaintiffs wrongly mentioned in..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 190, 200-- Complaint - When filed on the last day of limitation by a pleader in the absence of the complainant - Magistrate can accept the complaint...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Not applying for certified copy of judgment - No ground for condonation of delay per se...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay application - Must be supported by a proper affidavit - Affidavit in support of application typed and attested before application itself typed - Not proper affidavit - Means that application and its contents not known to person who had sworn affidavit in support of..........

Showing : 2191-2200 of 2616 Results