Showing : 71-80 of 119 Results

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 18-- Admission of facts of which liability in question a necessary consequence - Acknowledgement within meaning of Section 18 - Not necessary that there should be a specific and direct acknowledgement of a particular liability - Admission by defendant (mortgagee) in written statement - Can be taken as..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 12, 18-- Day of acknowledgment - To be excluded in computing the period of limitation...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Partnership Act, 1932, Section 18, 25, Limitation Act, 1963, Article 113-- Partner expelled from partnership firm - Held, partner can seek rendition of accounts, dissolution of partnership, share and profits etc. - Limitation is three years...........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 18, 29, Contract Act, 1872, Section 25-- Time barred debt - Acknowledgment - Period for filing the suit is saved and it commences from the date of such acknowledgment...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 18, Partnership Act, 1932, Section 45-- Acknowledgment - Partnership firm - Defendant No.2. one of the partners categorically informed Bank about disputes between partners - Acknowledgment of balance by other partner thereafter - Does not bind defendant No.2...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 18-- Acknowledgment - Must be in writing and signed by the person making it - Mere narration of the previous mortgage that had been created in the property is not sufficient for acknowledgment of liability...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 18-- Acknowledgment - Payment by cheque - Cheque dishonoured - It amounts to acknowledgment of a debt and a liability - Date of issuance of cheque assumes importance whether subsequently it is honoured or dishonoured...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 18-- Acknowledgment - Provision prescribes rigid conditions for its applicability - In order to amount to an acknowledgment to save limitation, a writing has to be signed by the parties or by any person through whom he derives his title or liability and afresh period of limitation shall be computed..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 18-- Income Tax Return, when not treated as acknowledgement - Returns produced in Court but not exhibited - Court left guessing whether Income Tax Returns signed or not - Official of Income Tax Department not produced to depose whether Income Tax Returns signed by any person duly authorised -..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 18-- Prescribes rigid conditions for applicability - Writing in order to amount to acknowledgement to save limitation - Must be signed by parties or by any person through whom he derives his title or liability - Fresh period of limitation shall be computed from the time when acknowledgement so signed -..........

Showing : 71-80 of 119 Results