Showing : 1051-1060 of 3297 Results

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 19-- Appeal - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Ground of delay of 93 days in filing the appeal is that the authorized representative of the OPs was severely ill - No proof of this ailment has been filed with the application for condonation of delay - The cause put forth by the..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 19-- Appeal - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Sufficient cause - Ground of delay of 93 days in filing the appeal is that the authorized representative of the OPs was severely ill - No proof of this ailment has been filed with the application for condonation of delay - The cause put forth by the..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 115, 96, 105-- Suit barred by limitation - Dismissal of - Revision - Maintainability - Held, dismissal of suit as barred by limitation is final as the adjudication on ground of limitation will have effect of finally disposing of suit, against which, an appeal lies u/s 96 of CPC - Deciding issue of limitation as..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Central Excise Act, 1944, Section 11AProviso-- Rules 173Q and 210 - Central Excise Rules, 1944, - Allegation of suppression of payment of duty by respondent-Company - Superintendent of Central Excise inspected premises of respondent-assessee on 25th October, 1996 and brought to the notice of authority - Show cause notice issued on 26th June,..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142(b)-- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint - Plea of limitation - Objection regarding maintainability of complaint on the ground of limitation is raised and decided against accused by High Court - Order of High Court was confirmed by Supreme Court - Those orders were passed at the initial stage upon..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 18-- Acknowledgment of liability - Must be in `writing' and `signed' by a party or its duly authorised agent - Burden of proof is on the plaintiff - Acknowledgement can be express or implied...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17-- Written statement and counter claim - Amendment - At the stage of consideration of application for amendment of pleadings the merits of amendment need not be gone into as also the issue of limitation - Parties can ask for appropriate issues to be framed in that regard at the hearing of the suit...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay - Condonation - While considering the delay condonation application, Court has to see the merit of the case also - Courts are known for imparting justice and not to scuttle the process of justice on technicalities...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Delay - Condonation - (1) Ordinarily a litigant does not stand to benefit by lodging an appeal late; (2) Refusing to condone delay can result in a meritorious matter being thrown out at the very threshold and cause of justice being defeated - As against this when delay is condoned the highest that..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 4, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Delay of three years - Condonation of delay - Mistake of clerk of counsel as he could not mark the case and counsel could not appear and case was dismissed for want of prosecution - Factum of dismissal came into notice of applicant on inspection of file..........

Showing : 1051-1060 of 3297 Results