Showing : 21-28 of 28 Results

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Article 58-- Not applicable where plaintiff in possession - Cause of action to seek declaration that plaintiff is owner in possession - Does not arise on the date of execution of sale deed and/or mutation - Cause of action would arise only when there is any threat to title of plaintiff - Mere wrong entry of..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Article 65-- Suit for possession whether barred by time inasmuch as mutation sanctioned in 1954 and suit filed in 1971 - Previous suit for declaration and injunction decreed on 15.3.1961 declaring plaintiffs to be owners in possession of suit land - Suit for possession filed in 1971 cannot be said to be barred..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Agreement to sell-- Specific performance - Suit for - Sale deed was to be executed after partition - Order of partition made on 16.11.1970 and Sanad Taqseem prepared on 20.4.1971 and mutation sanctioned on 15.6.1971 - Limitation to file suit starts to run on 15.6.1971...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Article 54-- Suit for specific performance - Limitation - No specific date fixed for execution of sale deed but the same was to be executed within six months of sanctioning of mutation in favour of vendor - Limitation would commence from date of sanction of mutation...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Article 113-- Possession of plaintiffs being threatened in the garb of mutation but basic suit for relief of injunction - On date of institution of suit plaintiffs being disturbed from possession in execution of order of Collector passed under Section 18 Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act in pursuance of which..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, Section 13B-- Application filed in 1979 while mutation sanctioned in 1964-Bar of limitation of 3 years-Though mutation of 1964 under challenge, till threatened in disturbance of possession not obliged to challenge-Limitation Act, Article 58...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Article 58-- Cause of action - Mutation - Mere entry of mutation in the name of defendant does not furnish any cause of action to the plaintiff - Cause of action arises in such like cases when the defendant threatens the plaintiff to take forcible possession...........
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER PUNJAB
Year of decision: 1972
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 34, 35, 36, 37-- Mutation on the basis of Civil Court decree - Decree time - barred - Revenue Officer not to give effect to Civil Court decree. The Civil Court decree which is not reflected in the revenue records for a number of years, becomes time-barred with the lapse of time and is hit by the provisions of the..........

Showing : 21-28 of 28 Results