Showing : 1-8 of 8 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8, 15-- Recovery of 223 kg poppy straw - Seizure memo - Proof - Signature of accused - At no stage even a suggestion was put to the witness that either the signatures of the accused were taken by fraud, coercion or mis-representation or that the signatures were not of the accused or that they did not..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 37, 20(c), 23, 28, 29, 67-- Bail - Contraband - Seizure of - Discrepancies in drawing of sample, custody, conveyance and forensic examination inter alia that three samples of 5 gms drawn in place of sample weight of 24 gms as mandated instruction issued by NCB - Physical properties, weight of suspected substance as recorded..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8, 15, 18-- Recovery of 18.350 kgs poppy straw and 8.047 kgs opium milk - Recovery effected from room which opens in a different direction towards field of one person - Prosecution miserably failed to prove that accused was actually in conscious possession or was having dominion over room from where recovery..........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1), 13(2), 7-- Illegal gratification - Proof - As per prosecution case, money was demanded for installation of telephone connection which as per evidence had already been installed on the date of occurrence itself - Admitted case of prosecution that after recovery of tainted money from pocket of appellant his..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Proof - Accused admitted borrowing of money from complainant - She stated that debt was discharged but complainant had retained cheques demanding more amount - She never took some precautionary measures like issuing stop memo to bank etc. - Further, accused did not responded..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 395, 397, Arms Act, 1959, Section 3, 25-- Dacoity - Proof of - Prosecution allegation that accused entered house of complainant and looted articles - Prosecution witnesses identified accused - Looted articles recovered from accused and identified by complainant - Recovery memo and arrest memo proved by witnesses - Desi 12 bore katta..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Banker's Books Evidence Act, 1891, Section 4, 2(3)-- Dishonour of cheque - Memo of dishonour - Mode of proof and evidentiary value attached to certain document u/s 4 of Bankers Books Evidence Act is not available to a memo of dishonour...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Loan account number mentioned as against the payee in the cheque - Amount to be adjusted from current account to loan account - It is an in-house transaction - Cheque return memo is conclusive proof to show that cheques were presented for payment - Acquittal could not be..........

Showing : 1-8 of 8 Results