Showing : 191-200 of 439 Results

THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14-- Motor cycle - Manufacturing date - Dispute as to - The date of sale is shown to be 12.1.2009 and in column '8' against the 'month and year of manufacture' it is written 'September, 2008' - The sale letter duly signed by the complainant who appears to be well educated - Not a case that the vehicle..........
H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 50, Sales of Goods Act, 1930, Section 30, 46-- Insurance claim - Repudiation - Ground that respondent had 'no insurable interest' in the vehicle as FIR registered by complainant stated that he had purchased the vehicle from respondent - Document of title is registration certificate issued by the competent Registering and Licensing Authority..........
H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f), 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r)-- Motor car - Maruti Omni 8 seater - Manufacturing defect - Unfair trade practice - Plea that respondent had sold 5 seater vehicle by misrepresenting the facts and had charged sale consideration for 8 seater vehicle and the vehicle sold suffered from manufacturing defect - No expert report has been..........
H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d)-- Consumer - Commercial purpose - Motor car - Purchase of Omni 8 seater - The purpose of purchase of the vehicle in question by the appellant was not exclusively commercial as it was purchased by her for her own use as also for family convenience - It was not registered as a transport vehicle -..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 168, 173-- Motor Vehicle Accident - Compensation - Death of retired teacher aged 65 - Earning Rs.3, 000/- p.m. i.e. Rs.975/- as pension and remaining by doing private profession of astrology - Nothing to disbelieve the sworn testimony of claimants on this issue though oral in nature - 1/3rd deduction made -..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f), 13(1)(b), 14-- Motor vehicle - Manufacturing defect - Expert evidence - Compensation - Vehicle suffered only minor defects in the nature of clutch plate, assembly, tool pump, valve, cylinder, slibs, piston rings etc. - Those cannot be termed as manufacturing defects, especially when the vehicle has been..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 2(21)-- Insurance claim - Repudiation - Driving licence - To drive Light Motor Vehicle - Laden gross weight of the vehicle which met with an accident is 10,050 kgs. much higher than the prescribed upper limit of 7,500 kgs. under Section 2(21) of the MV Act and it was a medium goods vehicle - Driver not..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 2(11), 14(2)-- Insurance claim - Repudiation - Driving licence - The driver of the vehicle was having driving licence to authorize him to drive a light motor vehicle where as at the time of accident he was driving a transport vehicle gross weight of which was 8700 kgs. - There was no endorsement on the driving..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f), 14(1)(d), Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166-- Motor vehicle - Manufacturing defect - Motor accident - Death of occupants - Compensation - Complaint maintainability - Jurisdiction - Consumer Fora - Merely on the ground of car having broken into two pieces, due to impact of accident, it cannot be presumed that there was any manufacturing defect..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166, 168, 173, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Motor Vehicle accident - Claim petition - Dismissal on ground that true owner of offending vehicle is not impleaded, without recording any finding as to ownership of vehicle - Held, not sustainable - When Tribunal can implead any person who ought to have been impleaded and whose presence is found..........

Showing : 191-200 of 439 Results