Showing : 11-20 of 55 Results

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13(1)(ia)-- Divorce - Cruelty - Wife had a job in Pune and agreed to get herself transferred to Mumbai after marriage - Contention of husband that her failure and refusal to abide by her commitment pertaining to transfer to Mumbai amounts to cruelty - Held, her evidence appears to be straightforward and..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 177, 179-- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint - Territorial jurisdiction - Complainant/company was carrying on business having its main office at Mumbai and had branches at various places including Bangalore - Cheque issued by accused has been returned by bankers of complainant/company at Bangalore where they..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142-- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint - Territorial jurisdiction - Cheques in question were presented for collection by respondent/complainant at Parwanoo - Communications of dishonouring cheques were given at Parwanoo - Material was supplied by respondent from Mumbai to Boisar - Respondent has a unit..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141-- Dishonour of cheque - Jurisdiction - Cheque dishonoured at Ahmedabad - Cheque drawn on bank located at Ahmedabad - By agreement between parties, jurisdiction of Courts was engrafted at Ahmedabad - Held, mere presentation of cheque for collection at Mumbai did not confer any jurisdiction to Court..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 125-- Maintenance - Grant of - Petitioner owns a house at Mumbai - She has some fixed deposits in the banks - She is undisputedly getting some interests on these deposits - No evidence adduced by either of parties as regards to deposits or interest therefrom - Undisputedly, she was living in a house..........
NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 17(2)-- Territorial jurisdiction - Cause of action - Complainant in his evidence had clearly asserted that he went to the office of -'B-' OP No. 5, first to collect the commercial invoice and subsequently to submit the same but after its verification he was advised by respondent/OP No. 5 to go to Mumbai -..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141, 142, 145-- Dishonour of cheque - Jurisdiction - Notice sent from Hapur - Reply sent from Mumbai at Hapur address - One of the components of offence that is notice in writing to the drawer of the cheque demanding payment of amount was sent from Hapur - Held, Court at Hapur has jurisdiction to try the case...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Jurisdiction - Agreement of loan took place at Indore and deed of agreement executed at Indore - Cheques were issued at Indore - Cheques were required to be presented at Indore - Cheque Processing Center at Mumbai cannot be equated with drawee bank - Merely because notice was..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 465, 467, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 169, 401-- Allegations that accused persons by forging documents sold property belonging to Govt. of U.S.S.R. - Property situated at Mumbai - Accused persons discharged - Order of discharge passed without giving any opportunity of hearing to complainant - Discharge order impugned in revision - delay of 245..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Airlines-- Deficiency in service - The complainant - appellant was not having a confirmed seat on Newark - Milan flight AZ - 607 - Thus, if OP 1 was unable to put the appellant/complainant on flight AZ 607 from Newark to Milan it could not be faulted for any deficiency in service - OP 1 however re - routed..........

Showing : 11-20 of 55 Results