Showing : 1-10 of 63 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364A, 365, 307, 392, 394, 186-- Kidnapping for ransom - Attempt to murder - Identification of accused - Accused pointed out a pistol on PW1 and threatened her to get down from car and consequently drove away car making occupant of car i.e PW21 and two girls as hostages - PW1 and PW21 correctly identified accused - Evidence of..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364A, 365, 307, 392, 394, 186-- Kidnapping for ransom - Attempt to murder - Testimony of police witness - PW3 and PW4 were on night patrolling duty and on noticing the alleged car as described in wireless message received from control room, they rushed towards car - Consequently, driver of car started ignition of car and..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364A, 365, 307, 392, 394, 186-- Kidnapping for ransom - Attempt to murder - Demand of ransom - Testimony of PW2 and PW14 shows that it was accused who made ransom call from mobile of PW14 to mobile of PW2 - Failure of prosecution to bring on record call detail record and not leading evidence with regard to location chart of..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364A, 365, 307, 392, 394, 186, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 106-- Kidnapping for ransom - Attempt to murder - Burden of proof - Chance prints lifted from stolen car were matched with right thumb of accused - No explanation given by accused as to how fingerprints were detected from said vehicle which was used during commission of offence - Testimonies of PWs are..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 30, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 392-- Confession of co-accused - Murder case - Accused cannot be convicted solely on the basis of extra-judicial confessional statements of co-accused, which were not corroborated by cogent and reliable evidence...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 392-- Recovery of rope - Murder case - Accused cannot be convicted on the basis of recovery of rope which was used for committing the offence in the absence of any link of rope with crime, as it is a common material or thing which is available anywhere in market or at every household - Accused..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 24, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 392-- Extra-judicial confession - Murder case - PW2 stated that accused confessed before PW1 and who in turn told about the same to him - Information received by PW2 from PW1 about extra-judicial confession made by accused is thus, hearsay - Such hearsay evidence of PW2 relating to so called confession..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 392, 34-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Recovery of tempo at the instance of accused - Tempo was recovered from open place and not from conscious possession of accused - Witnesses of recovery were examined by prosecution but they have not uttered a single word regarding said recovery being effected in..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 392, 34-- Test Identification parade (TIP) - Murder - Identity of accused already disclosed to witnesses before TIP - Identity of accused by said witnesses before Court is of no evidentiary value, as it is not fair and reliable - Consequently circumstantial evidence of last seen does not itself necessarily..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 392, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 65B(4)-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Call details - No evidence on record as to how call details brought on record to connect accused with commission of crime - Moreover, no evidence with regard to call details could be proved unless competent officer of concerned cell phone company came forward to..........

Showing : 1-10 of 63 Results