Showing : 11-20 of 132 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 379, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Last seen theory - PW11 identified all three accused in Court, who came at the time when he was washing his car along with deceased and he had last seen all of them sitting in Van on that day - Testimony of PW11 remains intact even during cross-examination, as he..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 379, 34-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Identification of dead body - Dead body of deceased recovered from farm of PW1 on information given by A-1 - Same was identified by mother and father of deceased - Dead body was further proved by skull imposition test...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 379, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27, 26-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Disclosure statement - Recovery of material objects - None of witnesses identified camera or stated belongings of deceased - Said statements are inadmissible in spite of mandate contained in S.27 of the Act, as it not resulted in discovery of new fact - Material..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364-- Murder of son by father - Circumstantial evidence - Accused committed murder of child/deceased by throwing him into canal, as he suspecting chastity of his wife and was under the impression that two sons including the deceased were born out of extra-marital relationship of her wife with someone -..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 201, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9-- Murder - Test identification parade (TIP) regarding photographs of dead body recovered from tank not conducted - Photographs of deceased cannot be relied upon for want of prior TIP - Doubt is created as to dead body recovered from tank was of deceased - Since corpus delicti was absent and there..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 392, 34-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Place of occurrence verified pursuant to information supplied on behalf of accused - However, place of occurrence was already known to police, in as much as, it is the same place from where dead body of deceased was recovered - Verification of place by accused..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 392, 34-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Recovery of tempo at the instance of accused - Tempo was recovered from open place and not from conscious possession of accused - Witnesses of recovery were examined by prosecution but they have not uttered a single word regarding said recovery being effected in..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 392, 34-- Test Identification parade (TIP) - Murder - Identity of accused already disclosed to witnesses before TIP - Identity of accused by said witnesses before Court is of no evidentiary value, as it is not fair and reliable - Consequently circumstantial evidence of last seen does not itself necessarily..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 392, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 65B(4)-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Call details - No evidence on record as to how call details brought on record to connect accused with commission of crime - Moreover, no evidence with regard to call details could be proved unless competent officer of concerned cell phone company came forward to..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 302, 201, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 24-- Abduction and murder of mother by son - Extra judicial confession - PW10, before whom confessional statement was given by accused is Village Administrative Officer - PW10 was known person though PW10 did not know accused - As accused himself choose to appear and give confessional statement before..........

Showing : 11-20 of 132 Results