Showing : 11-20 of 127 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 392, 34-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Place of occurrence verified pursuant to information supplied on behalf of accused - However, place of occurrence was already known to police, in as much as, it is the same place from where dead body of deceased was recovered - Verification of place by accused..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 392, 34-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Recovery of tempo at the instance of accused - Tempo was recovered from open place and not from conscious possession of accused - Witnesses of recovery were examined by prosecution but they have not uttered a single word regarding said recovery being effected in..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 392, 34-- Test Identification parade (TIP) - Murder - Identity of accused already disclosed to witnesses before TIP - Identity of accused by said witnesses before Court is of no evidentiary value, as it is not fair and reliable - Consequently circumstantial evidence of last seen does not itself necessarily..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 392, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 65B(4)-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Call details - No evidence on record as to how call details brought on record to connect accused with commission of crime - Moreover, no evidence with regard to call details could be proved unless competent officer of concerned cell phone company came forward to..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 302, 201, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 24-- Abduction and murder of mother by son - Extra judicial confession - PW10, before whom confessional statement was given by accused is Village Administrative Officer - PW10 was known person though PW10 did not know accused - As accused himself choose to appear and give confessional statement before..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 302, 201-- Abduction and murder of mother by son - Circumstantial evidence - Deceased was lastly seen alive with accused - He himself admitted that he used to pester and get money from deceased for his wayward life - Various recoveries made on the basis of extra judicial confession of accused and blood stain..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 364A, 368, 302, 147, 148, 342, 324, 201, 120B-- Bail - Kidnapping and murder - Case of both the accused not distinguishable from co-accused, who is already enlarged on bail - Both the accused are not named in the FIR and no incriminating material is recovered from them - Inconsistencies were found in the police statement of ocular witness -..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 376(2)(f), 302, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27-- Kidnapping, rape and murder of 4 years old girl - Disclosure statement - Confession leading to recovery of dead body - Deceased was last seen with accused by PW4 and PW5, which was corroborated by PW6 - Accused confessed his guilt and also disclosed place wherefrom dead body was recovered -..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 302, 201, 120B-- Abduction and murder - Circumstantial evidence - Entire case of prosecution starting from registration of FIR, confession leading to arrest, recovery among other things appears to be not correct and acceptable - Various doubts also improbabilities which are inherent, apart from infirmities found..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364, 302, 201, 120B-- Abduction and murder - Circumstantial evidence - Last seen theory - Father of deceased/PW1 went to the spot after getting information from villagers - He did not speak about information given by his other son/PW2 who stated to have seen deceased leaving with A1 and A2 - PW2 who overheard..........

Showing : 11-20 of 127 Results