Showing : 1101-1110 of 3666 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 190, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302-- Order taking cognizance - Murder - Negative final report - Protest petition filed - Statement u/s 161 Cr.P.C. discloses allegations against accused - PWs did not deviate from their previous version given to Police - Even if negative final report was filed by police, at this stage Magistrate was..........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 201, 34, Arms Act, 1959, Section 27, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Murder - Contradictions in the evidence of PWs regarding narration of occurrence, was minor in nature, not touching the root of prosecution case - Evidence cannot be discarded merely on the said contradictions...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 396-- Dacoity with murder - 10 to 12 dacoits armed with deadly weapons entered in the village and committed dacoity in the houses of villagers, which resulted in death of one villager and two accused - 8-9 co-accused were never traced out except present accused - However, evidence for recording..........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 201, 34, Arms Act, 1959, Section 27, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 54-- Murder - Character of accused - Merely because trial Court while convicting accused did not consider the antecedents of accused as stated by PW7 in his statement, it cannot be said that it violates the provision of S.54 of the Evidence Act...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 201, 34-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Recovered articles i.e axe and clothes were sent to FSL - However, in FSL report, no blood was found upon axe, so also, blood group upon clothes of accused, did not match with blood group of deceased - Recovery of axe and clothes of accused thus, cannot be..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 324, 326, 147, 149-- Murder - All the five eye witnesses have named A1 to A7 - Other accused have not been named by PW11 and PW18 - PW10 attributed specific role only to A1 to A7 in assaulting deceased - Conviction of A1 to A7 upheld - However, benefit of doubt given to A10 and A11, as they have not been named by PWs...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376, 302, 392-- Rape and murder - Robbery - Death sentence - Accused committed number of crimes not only before the incident but also within two days subsequent to present crime - As regarding leaving PW2, child unharmed, it is apparent that he was on a hasty retreat from the place of incident - Merely because..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 143, 147, 148, 149, 323-- Murder - Unlawful assembly - Common object - Accused no.1 arrived at the scene of occurrence with nine armed men out of which three were equipped with knives and rest were equipped with sticks - Incident occurred as a result of cold blooded plan to murder deceased - Nature of injury inflicted on..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 498A, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - As per prosecution version husband of deceased was having an affair with another lady and caused death of deceased with rope and then hanged her with Dupatta - As per evidence on record there is no eye-witness to said incident - Medical evidence does not..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 307-- Attempt to murder - Merely because single blow was inflicted, it cannot be said that S.307 IPC is not attracted, as even in a case of no injury S.307 IPC may be attracted...........

Showing : 1101-1110 of 3666 Results