Showing : 31-40 of 66 Results

KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, Section 3-- Enactment of Act -Does not override the provisions of general law entitling wives to claim return of amounts/ornaments retained by their divorced husbands...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Wakf Act, 1954, Section 3(1), Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 4, 5A-- Landowner creating charitable society dedicating land to society for running school and colleges - Acquisition of land by government for public purpose - Held, in the absence of evidence that owner had created a Wakf, society cannot claim that it was Wakf property and thus exemption from..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Divorce Act, 1869, Section 10(1)(x), Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13(1)(i)(a), 9, Special Marriage Act, 1954, Section 27(1)(d), Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939, Section 2(viii)-- Mental cruelty - Husband not allowing wife to take up employment in an MNC as wife has to travel long distances every day - No husband living in the present times can claim an anachronistic prerogative to finally rule on the career ambitions of his wife - Held, it amounts to mental cruelty -..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 125-- Maintenance - Muslim daughter - (a) Muslim daughters are entitled for maintenance from their father until they are married; (b) Major unmarried daughters unable to maintain themselves, are entitled to claim maintenance from their father who is capable of providing maintenance to them; (c)..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Mohammedan Law, Section 281-- Mulla's Principles of Mohammedan Law - Restitution of conjugal rights - Marriage stated to have taken place according to Muslim customs - Respondent denied the factum of marriage - Kaji who performed marriage not examined - His signatures on Nikahnama not got examined by a handwriting expert -..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 8-- Registration of marriage - Marriage between a Muslim and a Hindu - Marriage Officer is not competent to register such a marriage - Registration of such a marriage is per se illegal and does not give any marital status to the parties - Even otherwise, in absence of any claim and allegation by any..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Mulla's Principles of Mahomedan Law-- Clause 259(1) - Marriage - Mahomedan law - Marriage under the Mahomedan law is a civil contract and attracts all the incidents of contract - An idolatress or a fire-worshiper is not competent to marry a Muslim person - A marriage, however, with an idolatress or a fire worshipper, is not void, but..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, Section 12, Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, Section 2-- A Muslim minor girl aged 15 years marrying a Muslim boy aged 18 years - Held, this marriage may be void u/s 12 of the Act of 2006 - But it is a valid marriage under Muslim law as per S.2 of Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 which has not been repealed by Act of 2006 - Moreover,..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, Section 2, Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, Section 12-- Muslim minor girl aged 15 years marrying a Muslim boy aged 18 years without the consent of natural guardian - Uncle of minor girl filed writ of habeas corpus to recover minor girl from the custody of husband - The girl who is now more than 15 years of age has the option under the Muslim law to..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 125, Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, Section 3-- Maintenance - Granted upto period of Iddat - Thereafter she moved an application under S.3 of the Act which was allowed by the trial Court but was dismissed by revisional Court - The order of revisional Court became final as the same was not challenged in the Higher Court - Petitioner again moved..........

Showing : 31-40 of 66 Results