Showing : 121-130 of 510 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38-- Permanent injunction - Possession alleged to be delivered on payment of Rs.16,000/- and consequential execution of a receipt dated 13.05.1981 - Executant of receipt died and inheritance mutation was sanctioned on 28.04.1990 - Mention of inheritance mutation sanctioned on 28.04.1990 in receipt..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(2), Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Cheating - Illegal gratification - Dishonest intention - Area of 11 biswas Bagicha mutated in favour of appellant almost thrice the area which was subject matter of declaratory suit decreed in favour of appellant - Site underneath house was only 4 biswas - There was no reference of any Bagicha..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consent decree-- Challenged - Alleged to be the result of fraud and misrepresentation - Person who suffered the consent decree used to sign but affixed thumb impressions on written statement and statement recorded in Court - In reply to interrogatories defendant stated that there were no other documents bearing..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10(2)-- Impleadment of a party - Suit for specific performance - Land in disputed recorded in the name of one `B' after death of his father `K' - Petitioner did not challenge mutation entry immediately - During pendency of suit petitioner moved Revenue Court to seek his share in the property - Perusal of..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420-- Cheating - Bail application - Grant of - Accused a property dealer, charge-sheeted for offence of cheating - Land was purchased by accused for consideration of Rs.1,44,00,000/- - Accused assured informant that she would be first paid Rs.6 lacs out of aforesaid consideration and remaining amount..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 41, Rule 27-- Appeal - Additional Evidence - Rejection of application - As per petitioner, respondent No.1 has sold the premises in year 2005 and he is now no more owner of structure and has no locus-standi to file eviction petition - Petitioners have already placed on record copy of sale deed whereby..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Haryana Ceiling on Lands Holdings Act, 1972, Section 12(3), 26, Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953, Section 5-- Allotment of surplus area - Land of big landowner declared surplus under Act of 1953 on 05-01-1960 - Mutation sanctioned in favour of State of Haryana - Said land came to be vested in the state after commencement of Act of 1972, u/s 12(3) of the said Act - Plaintiff purchased said land on..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2)-- Patwari demanded bribe to enter mutation - Material discrepancies in the statement of complainant and shadow witness with regard to the visit of the office of the accused, purchase of the plot and with regard to time taken by the police party in raid - Independent witness not joined - Official..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 179, 180, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 465, 471, 120B-- Forged sale deed executed by impersonating and registered at Calcutta - Identifying Advocate found non existent - Land situated in District Varanasi - Mutation got sanctioned in District Varanasi - CJM, Varanasi has jurisdiction to entertain complaint and pass appropriate order as forged sale deed..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Compromise decree-- Suffered by a blind person - Plea of fraud - Held, merely because the defendants were blind, could not warrant an inference that the decree was outcome of fraud - Defendant signed written statement and suffered statement in the court - Mutation sanctioned - Defendants choose not to object the..........

Showing : 121-130 of 510 Results