Showing : 141-150 of 497 Results

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Adverse possession-- Co-owners - Properties possessed by some of the co-owners - It is possession for and on behalf of other co-owners unless the ouster is made out explicitly by the co-owner in possession by an overt act - Mutation entry is not an indication of adverse possession - One co-owner, in exclusive..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 114, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Family settlement - Thumb impression of complainant forged - On that basis property transferred and mutation effected - Civil suit filed by complainant against the purchasers of that property - Held, that simply because act of accused involves civil liability it does not absolve him from criminal..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 197-- Public servant - Sanction for prosecution - Mutation by Naib Tehsildar - Allegation against petitioner are that he sanctioned mutation on basis of certain reports submitted to him by the Subordinate officers - Merely because allegations of forgery and conspiracy are levelled against petitioner, it..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 467, 468-- Naib Tehsildar - Sanctioned mutation on the report of his subordinate officers - Held, that while passing order of mutation by Naib Tehsildar in exercise of power under Land Revenue Act, he acts as a Judge and he cannot be prosecuted on the ground of aiding and abetting main accused alleged to..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Mutation-- Consent of plaintiff - Plaintiff was neither present nor he signed the mutation proceedings - So it can't be said that mutation was sanctioned with the consent of plaintiff...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 58, 113-- Right to sue - When plaintiff claims himself to be owner in exclusive possession of suit property - Right to sue accrued to plaintiff when defendant actually threatened to take forcible possession and not when the mutation was sanctioned in their favour - Under S.113 Limitation Act, limitation is..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Mutation-- Does not confer any title - Mutation is only for fiscal purposes to complete the record...........
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 34, 35-- Mutation - Can be sanctioned on the basis of registered sale deed even if possession not transferred - Sale deed not challenged - Vendors having no objection in sanctioning of mutation - Revenue Officers duty bound to give effect to the registered sale deed. 2005 (2) PLR 103 (DB) relied...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Temporary injunction - For grant of temporary injunction Court can refer to documents which are produced on record without formal proof - Court has to consider the material on record in its entirety - Affidavits which are filed on record have to be read in consonance with the pleadings of the..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Section 2(b)-- Orders passed by Quasi Judicial Authorities, while interpreting the judgment/order passed by High Court, in respect of mutation proceedings which does not confer any right by itself - Orders open to challange before competent court of law - Whether amounts to civil contempt within the meaning of..........

Showing : 141-150 of 497 Results