Showing : 651-660 of 4105 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 42-- Recovery of 6.50 kg opium - Non-compliance of S.42 of the Act - As and when police party is on patrol duty, S.42 of the Act is not attracted...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8, 18-- Recovery of 6.50 kg opium - Mere weight of sample found 2-3 grams less, when reached FSL, does not create doubt on prosecution case, particularly, when on efflux of time, moisture will dry it...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8, 18-- Recovery of 6.50 kg opium - Quantum of sentence - Recovery effected in 2006 and since then accused is in custody - Accused suffered a protracted trial and undergone more than substantive sentence awarded by trial Court - So far as default sentence is concerned, since default in payment of fine is..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 35, 54-- Onus to prove - Recovery of 500 gms Charas - Once prosecution established that contraband was found from possession of accused, onus will shift to accused in view of provisions mentioned u/ss 35, 54 of NDPS Act...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8, 20, 23-- Recovery of 500 gms Charas - Weight of Contraband - Neither in recovery memo nor in statement of PWs any reason has been brought that there was no facility available of weighing contraband recovered from accused - In what circumstances weight of contraband was taken gives rise to suspicion to..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8, 20, 23-- Recovery of 500 gms Charas - Seal of samples - No evidence on record that seal with which recovered contraband was sealed on spot was placed before witnesses of fact in Court at the time of their statements being recorded and same matched with seal affixed on recovered contraband - Prosecution..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8, 20, 23-- Recovery of 500 gms Charas - Non deposit of contraband in Malkhana - Prosecution failed to prove by showing any entry made in Malkhana register that alleged contraband was kept in Malkhana in sealed condition, which was very essential to remove doubts that there could be any tampering with it -..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8, 20, 23-- Recovery of 500 gms Charas - Search and seizure - Delay in sending sample of recovery to FSL - Where delay in sending sample to FSL not explained by prosecution by adducing any evidence, benefit of the same goes to accused...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 60-- Recovery of 500 gms Charas - Non-seizure of vehicle in question - It was essential for police to seize the motorcycle allegedly being driven by accused and from where recovery effected - In the absence of same benefit goes to accused - Accused acquitted...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50-- Recovery of 500 gms Charas - Search and seizure - Recovery effected from dicky of motorcycle of accused and not from personal search of accused - Provision of S.50 of the Act not applicable...........

Showing : 651-660 of 4105 Results