Showing : 741-750 of 3913 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20-- Recovery of 500 gms charas - Testimony of police officials - PWs remained unshaken with regard to conducting of raid and apprehension of accused as well as co-accused with the contraband - Testimony of raiding party members also duly corroborated by CFSL report, which shows that when sealed sample..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20-- Recovery of 500 gms charas - Reduction of sentence - Accused already undergone about 8 months of incarceration for possession of 500 gms of charas - He was arrested in 1995 and he would have completed 10 years in 2005 if he remained confined in jail for the said period - Keeping in view the..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20-- Recovery of 500 gms charas - Reduction of sentence - Accused already undergone about 8 months of incarceration for possession of 500 gms of charas - As per sentence awarded to accused, he would have completed 10 years in the year 2005 if he remained confined in jail for the said period - Sentence..........
JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8, 15-- Recovery of 16 kg Bhukki - Delay occurred in sending samples to FSL - No evidence on record to show that where samples were kept after same were taken - Neither Malkhana register produced nor I.O produced - Prosecution failed to prove its case - Accused rightly acquitted...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 22-- Contraband - Appellant not apprehended on the spot - No recovery made from the possession of accused or his presence from the house alleged to be belonging to accused - Recovery at the instance of co-accused from the house of accused, even if admitted may not be sufficient to prosecute the accused..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985, Section 22(c)-- Recovery of 56 gms smack and 700 gms of diazempam powder - Accused was not caught on the spot and no recovery of any prohibited contraband is alleged to have been made from his possession - Recovery effected from the house of co-accused - There is no evidence on record that accused was related to..........
JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20(b)(c)-- Recovery of 3 kg charas - Sample of charas weighing 100 gms but FSL received only 30 gms - Serious doubt arises about the sample itself - Accused to be acquitted solely on this ground - Accused acquitted...........
JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20(b)(c)-- Recovery of 3 kg charas - Non production of six PWs which include I.O and SHO - Conviction unsustainable...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8(c), 20(b), 29, 31-- Contraband - Enhanced sentence - Accused convicted second time for the same offence - He was 65 years of age and suffering from various ailments - It is not a case where maximum punishment and thereafter multiplier of one and one-half times applied, as awarded by High Court - Held, keeping in view..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 67-- Contraband - Confession - Statement made by accused is voluntary, which was never retracted by accused - Confessional statement specifically read out to accused in the language which he understood, and only thereafter he put his signatures - In the absence of any retraction to such statement,..........

Showing : 741-750 of 3913 Results