Showing : 1-10 of 35 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 21-- Recovery of 5 gms smack - Testimony of official witnesses - All official witnesses stated in one voice that contraband was recovered from accused - Notice u/s 50 of NDPS Act was served upon accused and contents of notice were duly explained to accused - Testimony of raiding party duly corroborated..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 21-- Recovery of 5 gms smack - Reduction of sentence - Accused already undergone 1 year 11 months and 14 days incarceration for possession of 5 gms of smack - Keeping in view the beneficial provision of amended NDPS Act of 2001, sentence awarded to accused reduced to sentence already undergone by him...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 21-- Recovery of 100 gms smack - Reduction of sentence - Accused already undergone about 3 years 7 months and 25 days incarceration for possessing 100 gms of smack - He was arrested in 1999 and as per sentence awarded, he would have completed 10 years in the year 2009, if he remained confined in jail..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 21-- Recovery of 100 gms smack - Secret information - Search and seizure - Notice u/s 50 of NDPS Act duly served to accused, as contents of notice were explained to accused before conducting search - Testimony of official witnesses as to conducting of raid and apprehension of accused is trustworthy and..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8, 21-- Recovery of smack - Non-association of independent witnesses - No reasonable efforts were made by official witnesses to find independent witnesses so that they may join the search - After following some formality two constables were made independent witnesses and all proceedings were conducted in..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 21, 61, 85-- Recovery of 50 gms smack - Reduction of sentence - Accused convicted and sentenced to 10 years RI - Accused already undergone 3 years and 6 days incarceration for possession of 50 gms of smack - Keeping in view the beneficial provisions of amended NDPS Act of 2001 sentenced reduced to period..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 21-- Recovery of smack - Prosecution stated that seal after use was handed over to ASI, witness of recovery but said witness has not been examined nor any reason has been given for his no, examination - Non-examination of witness of seal and lapse on the part of I.O to collect evidence about ownership..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985, Section 50, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 100-- Smack - Recovery of 1 Kg. - Recovery made under supervision of SHO but search was made by a Constable - Held, on a conjoint reading of S.50 of NDPS Act and S.100 Cr.P.C. there is no requirement that the authorized person has to personally search the offender...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50-- Recovery of smack from possession of accused - Accused was informed that a Gazetted officer or a Magistrate could be arranged for taking his search, if he so required - Held, this intimation could not be treated as communicating to accused that he had a right under law to be searched before said..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 167(2), Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 36A(4)-- Contraband - Recovery of 3 Kg. of smack - Challan when not filed within period stipulated, accused gets an indefeasible right to the grant of bail and Court is to grant bail...........

Showing : 1-10 of 35 Results