Showing : 1-10 of 2000 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50-- Compliance of S.50 of the Act - Accused declined offer u/s 50 of the Act - Raiding team is nevertheless required to have the search of accused conducted in the presence of a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate - Accused and bags searched by raiding team and not in the presence of any Gazetted Officer..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50-- Recovery of 100 kg ganja - Simultaneous search of accused and bags in his possession - S.50 of the Act would apply and compliance therewith would be mandatory...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985-- Case under NDPS Act - Faulty investigation - Accused get bail and ultimately also earn acquittal due to faulty investigation - Guidelines issued - Director General Police, Punjab, Haryana and Chandigarh directed to prepare PDF File of (i) mandatory guidelines; (ii) directory checklist and to..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8, 15, 18, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439-- Recovery of 320 gms opium and poppy straw weighing 14 kg 400 gms - Recovery effected below commercial quantity - Without expressing any opinion on merits bail granted...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50-- Recovery of 40 injections of avil and 40 injections of norgesic - Non-compliance of S.50 of the Act - Consent memo shows that offer is given to accused by I.O either to be searched by him or a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate, which is contrary to provisions of S.50 of the Act - There is thus,..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 22C-- Recovery of 40 injections of avil and 40 injections of norgesic - FIR number is mentioned in various documents prior to registration of FIR - No explanation given by ASI for the same, which created doubt in prosecution case...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 52A-- Recovery of 40 injections of avil and 40 injections of norgesic - Magistrate nowhere mentioned in its order that seal `BS' and `GS' were there on sample parcels or that he has tallied both these seals with sample chit - I.O simply directed to deposit case property and sample parcel in Malkhana -..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 22C-- Recovery of 40 injections of avil and 40 injections of norgesic - Delay of 6 days in depositing case property to FSL - No explanation given for such delay - No link evidence is there to prove that in intervening period when case property remained in possession of MHC, seals were never tampered..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 22C-- Recovery of 40 injections of avil and 40 injections of norgesic - Search and seizure - Material discrepancies in statement of PW3 and PW5 regarding time of recovery - PW3 gives no explanation about mentioning of FIR number in some of documents, whereas, PW5 has stated that same were incorporated..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50-- Contraband - Chance recovery - S.50 of the Act not required to be complied with...........

Showing : 1-10 of 2000 Results