Showing : 651-660 of 2069 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 22-- Contraband - Seal after use not handed over to independent witness and no explanation for the same - IO not examined as he was reported to have died - Recovery witness produced by prosecution did not state a word that case property was produced by I.O. before S.H.O. in his presence and that SHO..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 22-- Diazepam tablets - Recovery of - Accused not a licencee - Not carrying on business of sale and purchase of drugs against a valid licence - Held, recovery of Diazepam tables without licence from the accused is punishable under the Act...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 21, 8(c), 54-- Contraband - Found in possession of accused - Panch witness supported prosecution case - Prosecution proved that substance seized from possession of accused came to be analysed by FSL - Presumption u/s 54 of the Act applicable - Weight of manufactured drug found to be 352 gms. which is exceeding..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50-- Search - Contraband found from cotton bag held by accused - Prosecution not required to follow mandatory provision of S.50 of the Act...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 2(iii)(a), 2(iii(c), 20-- Charas - Percentage of tetrahydrocannabinol in the sample not indicated - No test conducted to ascertain as to whether stuff was Charas that is to say resin, or some other preparation of cannabis - It cannot be said that stuff was in fact `Charas' - As regards cystolithic hair, these being the..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20-- Contraband - Conscious possession - Recovery from vehicle - Accused driving and alone in vehicle - Presumption is that stuff recovered belongs to him - Prosecution is not required to prove ownership of vehicle or how accused happened to be in control of that vehicle...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20-- Charas - Information that accused has kept charas in his shop - Police not searching shop and instead searching person of accused - Only 50 gms. charas wrapped in a plastic envelope recovered - Held, such a small quantity can easily be planted and even manipulated to be demonstrated to have been..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 18-- Contraband - Conscious possession - No question regarding conscious possession of contraband put to accused in his statement u/s 313 Cr.P.C. - Possession of co-accused does not necessarily mean that appellant was in conscious possession of the contraband - No knowledge was attributed to him and no..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 18-- Contraband - Delay of 25 days in sending sample for analysis - Ample room for manipulation and tampering - Doubt created about the handling of sample - In case doubt is created in the case of prosecution, then benefit of such doubt goes to accused...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 15-- Poppy husk - Independent witness not joined - Case based on official witnesses - When case of prosecution is based on official witnesses only then even minor contradictions assume significant role, to cast a doubt on the prosecution story relating to the alleged recovery...........

Showing : 651-660 of 2069 Results