Showing : 51-60 of 2025 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20(b)(ii)(C)-- Recovery of 285 kgs ganja - Search and seizure - Merely not informing concerned Police Station of area and failure to test material recovered through equipment but by only smell, cannot in any manner affect the prosecution case which is otherwise duly proved through testimonies of witnesses who..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20(b)(ii)(B)-- Recovery of 400 gms charas - Prosecution case duly supported by I.O and recovery witness - Requisite provisions of S.50 of NDPS Act were duly complied - Case property after recovery was also produced before SHO of police station - Prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt - Accused..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50-- Recovery of 285 kgs ganja - Compliance of S.50 of the Act - Service of notice u/s 50 of the Act on accused and accused refusing to avail his right u/s 50 of the Act duly proved by testimonies of PW3, PW5 and PW8 as also through reply given in hand of accused - In fact, case of accused is that he..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20(b)(ii)(C)-- Recovery of 285 kgs ganja - Difference in weighment of sample - Custody of samples duly proved by prosecution right from drawing of samples till same were produced before FSL by way of testimonies of PW5, PW7, PW2 and PW6 - FSL report also states that sealed parcels were received by it with seals..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20(b)(ii)(C)-- Recovery of 285 kgs ganja - Difference in weighment of sample - Merely because at the time of trial it was found that some bags were cut from various places due to mice bites, case of prosecution does not get affected in any manner...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20(b)(ii)(C)-- Recovery of 285 kgs ganja - Difference in weighment of sample - Case property was kept in respective bags - PW3 clearly states about bags containing `leaves, flowers and small twigs' - FSL report clearly shows that what was recovered was ganja - Some of bags that were produced before trial Court..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20(b)(ii)(C)-- Recovery of 285 kgs ganja - Defence of accused was one of complete denial of presence at the site - Accused stated that he was picked up from his house and not from scene of crime - It was therefore, not the case of accused that he was merely a passenger of Three Seater Rickshaw (TSR) and was..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 42(2)-- Contraband - Report submitted by detecting officer u/s 42(2) of NDPS Act to anybody other than his immediate superior officer, cannot be legally accepted as a report u/s 42(2) of the Act...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 18-- Framing of charge - Offence u/s 18 of NDPS Act and u/ss 120-B, 379, 201 IPC - Movement of accused `D' from place `J' to `A' by stealing sim - Travelling of accused `B' in same compartment as that of `H' and communication of `B' with accused `D' and thereafter `D' calling police from stolen sim and..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 21(c), 25, 32, Haryana De-addiction Centre Rules, 2010, Rule 6-- Drug De addiction Centre - Running without licence - Stocking of eight types of drugs containing Buprenorphine - Running Drug De addiction Centre without having any license is violative of provisions of NDPS Rules - However, there is no provision whatsoever either under NDPS Act or D & C Act,..........

Showing : 51-60 of 2025 Results