Showing : 281-289 of 289 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8, 18, 42, 50-- Material contradictions in the statement of witnesses as to in whose custody the sample of contraband remained - Malkhana register not produced in evidence - It can safely be held that the prosecution has not been able to prove that the seals remained intact right from seizure till the same were..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8, 18-- For conviction accused must be in conscious possession of contraband...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8, 18-- Opium - Recovered from a heap of kadvi lying on the boundary of agricultural field survey Nos.1511 & 1517 - One belonging to appellant and other to father of acquitted accused - No evidence as to who placed kadvi on boundary of two fields - Though ownership of two survey Nos. recorded in revenue..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50, 18-- Opium - Search made in presence of DSP - No violation of S.50 - There is no requirement that Gazetted Officer should not be of Police Department...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 18, 8-- Search - Accused given option of search before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate but accused not informed that it is his right to be searched in presence of Gazetted Officer or Magistrate - Held, it is non compliance of mandatory provision of S.50...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8, 18, 27A, 29-- Sample - Two different dates of despatch of sample to Forensic Science Laboratory - It cannot be said that what was seized from the accused was sent to the Chemical Examiner - On this ground alone, the accused is entitled to acquittal...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8, 18, 42, 50-- Search - Option given whether accused would like to be searched before a Magistrate or a Gazetted Police Officer - When word 'Police Gazetted Officer' is there in the notice it cannot be held that compliance of S.50 of the Act has been made - This is a blatant disregard of the provision of S.50 of..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50(4), 18-- Female - Search - To be searched by a female - Provision of S.50(4) is mandatory - Search of a female made by a male - Search is vitiated - Accused acquitted...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8, 42(2), 18-- Accused found sitting on a public road - Neither the procedure u/s 42(2) of the Act was required to be followed nor the site plan was required to be prepared...........

Showing : 281-289 of 289 Results