Showing : 11-20 of 255 Results

TRIPURA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 37, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439-- Bail - Twin tests as enumerated in S.37 of NDPS Act are to be satisfied by Court while considering grant or rejection of bail - Failure to satisfy two conditions would disentitle accused to get privilege of bail...........
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 37, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439-- Bail - Offence under NDPS Act - Grant of bail when an accused is charged with specific offences under NDPS Act is impaired and circumscribed by rigorous negative pre-conditions enumerated in S.37 of NDPS Act - Stipulations in S.37 of NDPS Act are negative, intended to restrict power to grant bail..........
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 37, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439-- Recovery of 93.900 kg cannabis - Bail - Secret information - Accused found involved in illicit trade of NDPS - Due compliance of provision of S.42 of the Act made out - Independent witnesses joined the search and seizure process - Twin tests as enumerated in S.37 of the NDPS Act not satisfied by..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 37, 20(b)(ii)(A), 22(c), 29, 50, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439-- Recovery of 2.890 gms Hashish - Bail - Non-compliance of S.50 of NDPS Act will be sufficient to vitiate conviction for illegal possession of contraband - Said no, compliance cannot be said to be mere technical breach - Applicant cannot be prima facie held responsible for unlawful possession of..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 37, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 438-- Contraband - Pre-arrest bail - S.37 NDPS Act does not create absolute bar but only create some rigid restrictions...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 37, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 437, 438-- Contraband - S.37 NDPS Act only uses the expression `bail, therefore, restrictions u/s 37 of the Act apply to regular bail as well as to anticipatory bail...........
TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 37, 8, 22-- Bail - Commercial quantity - Recovery of 100 gms Alprazolum from A-1 and 6 kg from A-2 - There is disclosures by accused persons within meaning of S.67 of NDPS Act regarding contraband - Conscious possession of contraband proved on record and both the accused got culpable mental state regarding..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 29, 20(b)(ii)(C), 37, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439-- Recovery of 22 kg 200 gms ganja - Commercial quantity - Bail - Contraband recovered was entrusted to co-accused by petitioner for the purposes of sale - CDR details collected by I.O containing communication between co-accused and petitioner on record - Vehicle carrying contraband was registered in..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 37, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439-- Bail - Recovery of 2 kg 500 gms heroine - Commercial quantity - Statutory bar u/s 37 of NDPS Act is applicable - Bail not granted to petitioners...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8, 18, 29, 37-- Bail - Offence u/ss 8, 18, 29 NDPS - Accused seeking bail to enable himself to lead evidence - However, examination of accused u/s 313 Cr.P.C. is complete and evidence from defence side started - Disclosure statement attributed to accused is not per se inadmissible - Moreover, it is not a case of..........

Showing : 11-20 of 255 Results