Showing : 41-50 of 89 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 22(c), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 313-- Contraband - Statement of accused u/s 313 Cr.P.C. - Questions not put to accused with regard to receipt of secret information and report of FSL - Incriminating circumstances appearing in statement of PW's not put to accused - Question not put with regard to investigation conducted by first I.O. -..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 22(c)-- Wife examined as a defence witness - Evidence cannot be discarded merely on the ground of relationship - Truthfulness or otherwise depends upon facts and circumstances of each case...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 22-- Morphine injections - Petitioner alleged to have carried 700 injections of morphine - Strength of morphine in each injection not more than 0.2% - Held, no offence made out - Petitioner discharged...........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 22, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- 800 injections of Morphine seized from petitioner - Strength of Morphine in each injection not more than 0.2% - Held, no offence made out against petitioner - FIR and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom quashed...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 2(xxiii), 22(C)-- Cancellation of bail - Recovery of 25 Kg. of `Methamphetamine' - Recovery much beyond limits of commercial quantity - Accused involved in export of contraband - No case of accused that they have any licence, permit or authorization either to manufacture or possess or store sand substance - Facts..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 22, 61, 85, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 18(c), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945, Rules 65 and 66 - FIR lodged u/ss 22, 61 and 85 of the NDPS Act against accused - Accused chemist by business and was carrying sale of medicines with salt (Dextropropoxyphene , Diphenoxylate, paracetamol and Diclomine), without a valid drug license and valid..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 37, 22, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439-- Regular bail - Accused allegedly found in possession of Alprozolam tablets weighing 280.80 grams which is commercial quantity - Accused contended that he was a registered medical practitioner and was having certificate issued by paramedical council and thus was authorized to deal with the drugs -..........
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20, 22-- Recovery of 2 Kg. charas - Conviction set aside on the grounds : (a) Recovery shown at noon but there is no public witness of recovery; (b) police party did not weigh the quantity of charas; (c) sample not taken at the time of preparing recovery memo; (d) No evidence that sample remained sealed..........
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20, 22-- Recovery of 2 Kg. charas - Conviction only on the ground that 2 Kg. charas could not have been planted - Prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt - Conviction set aside...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 22, 61, 85-- Petitioner found in possession of some drugs - Plea that drugs do not fall under NDPS Act - Report of Committee constituted by State Government to review the matter stated that provisions of NDPS Act are not attracted but allegations disclosed commission of offence under Drugs and Cosmetics Act -..........

Showing : 41-50 of 89 Results