Showing : 61-70 of 71 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Suit for specific performance - During pendency of suit defendant sold suit property to third persons - Presence of subsequent vendees in whose favour defendant has alienated the property in dispute is necessary for effective and complete adjudication of the suit - Amendment of plaint allowed and..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 15, 16-- Suit for specific performance - Subsequent purchaser is a necessary party - Third party having interest in suit property is a proper and necessary party - Equity requires that all parties having prima facie claim or interest in suit property in a suit for specific performance must be allowed to..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 3-- Necessary party - Suit for specific performance - Flat owned by defendant in co-operative society - No relief claimed against society - If suit was decreed in favour of plaintiff, society has to accept plaintiff as its member - Consequently society would not be necessary party to suit...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Agreement to sell-- Suit for specific performance - More than one party - In the case of co-contractees it is not necessary that all of them should be ranged on the same side for obtaining specific performance - It is sufficient if all of them are before the Court...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Specific Relief Act, Section 22-- Specific performance of contract - Can be enforced by any party to contract - If more parties than one - Specific performance of contract cannot be granted in the absence of some of the parties - Parties entitled to benefit of contract if not willing to be arrayed as plaintiff - Should be..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleadment as party, in a suit for specific performance, of subsequent vendee who got sale deed executed through Court after filing suit - Applicant not only necessary party to suit but impleadment will set at rest controversy relating to property...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleadment of purchaser of later agreement to sell as defendant in a suit for specific performance of earlier agreement to sell, on the allegation that plaintiff and defendant colluding with each other in order to frustrate and defeat rights of applicant - Applicant already filed a suit for..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1994
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Agreement to sell - Suit for specific performance - Applicant claiming to be impleaded as a defendant on the basis of another agreement to sell in his favour - Neither a necessary nor a proper party -Cannot be impleaded as a defendant...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1992
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleading of a party - Suit for specific performance - Long before agreement of sale of property, the same was gifted by registered deed of wakf for religious and charitable purposes - Ownership vested with wakf Board - Interveners directly interested in subject matter of suit - Held, Muthavalli..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1990
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleading of a party - Suit for specific performance - During pendency of suit one G obtained a sale deed in his favour of a part of the suit property in execution of aex parte decree obtained by him against the defendant - Held, G is a necessary party - Allowed to be impleaded as a part in the..........

Showing : 61-70 of 71 Results