Showing : 31-37 of 37 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Complaint - Dismissal for default - Complaint fixed for 20th May but counsel misheard it to be 22nd May - Non appearance of complainant or his counsel on 20th May was neither intentional nor due to negligence - Order of dismissal for default set aside...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1994
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 7-- Dismissal for default - Restoration - Bonafide mistake on the part of counsel not to appear and circumstances ex-plained do not amount to deliberate action or negligence on the part of the counsel - Suit restored...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1991
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 7-- Suit dismissed for default - Restoration - As plaintiffs counsel had to go out of station he directed another advocate to put in appearance - That advocate could not appear on account of tooth ache - Held, there is sufficient cause for restoration of the suit - Litigant not to suffer for..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1989
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Condonation of delay-Delay occasioned on account of an error or negligence of the counsel or his office-No negligence or inaction on the part of the applicant-Held, a litigant should not suffer or account of the laches or inaction of his counsel - In the instant case the Court below did not find..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1978
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 17, 19, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 43, Rule 1(t)-- Appeal dismissed for default as appellant as well as counsel absent - Application for restoration of appeal also dismissed for default as neither appellant nor counsel present - Second Appeal from Order accepted and appeal restored - Party should not be made to suffer for negligence or default of..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1975
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 1, 4-- Compromise by counsel without consent of client - Duty of junior when appearing with senior in the case - While we are not prepared to consider in this case whether an Advocate or pleader is liable to legal action in case of deviance or negligence, we must uphold the actual though implied,..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 0000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Exparte decree - Setting aside - Delay - Counsel assured party that he will take care of the case but he never informed the defendant about any date fixed in the trial Court - Defendant met with an accident and remained admitted in hospital and that he was on bed rest for about a period of six..........

Showing : 31-37 of 37 Results