Showing : 51-55 of 55 Results

KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Jurisdiction - Court within whose jurisdiction the cheque is presented has also got jurisdiction to entertain a complaint for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 118(1)-- Cash cheque is a legal and valid negotiable instrument - Non mentioning of payee's name and the striking off the words `or bearer' does not make the cheque invalid...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 118(g), 9-- Bearer cheque - Dishonoured due to insufficiency of funds - There is presumption under S.118(g) that holder of a negotiable instrument is a holder in due course - Under Section 118(a), there is a presumption that every negotiable instrument was made or drawn for consideration - This presumption..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Cheque - 'Holder in due course' - Cheque payable to bearer - The expression 'Holder in due course' means a person who is possessor of an instrument even when it is payable to bearer - If the bill is payable to holder then he has to be a payee or endorsee of the same...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1992
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138(a)-- `Drawn' - Cheque or instrument must be said to have been drawn on the date it bears for purposes of computation of period of its validity even though it was drawn or prepared on a different date...........

Showing : 51-55 of 55 Results