Showing : 91-100 of 6991 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 304(Part I)-- Nature of offence - Sudden fight between two brothers - Accused had not come armed to spot with a weapon of offence - No witness has testified as to any past enmity and acrimony between two brothers - No external injuries were present and noticed in rib area - There is hardly any evidence to..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100-- Second appeal - Substantial question of law - Concurrent finding of fact - Appellant is entitled to point out that it is bad in law because it was recorded de hors the pleadings or it was based on no evidence or it was based on misreading of material documentary evidence or it was recorded against..........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20(b)(ii)(c), 29-- Recovery of 60 cakes and 110 capsules of Hashish - Recording of evidence of official witnesses on affidavit - There is no provision in NDPS Act permitting recording of evidence of members of raiding party by way of affidavit - However, members of raiding party deposed by filing affidavit evidence..........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20(b)(ii)(c), 29-- Recovery of 60 cakes and 110 capsules of Hashish - Search and seizure - Contraband recovered from accused while they were travelling in train - PWs 1 and 2 establish beyond doubt that DRI officials on fateful day went to railway station and upon boarding train had identified accused with their..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 366-- Kidnapping - Statements of PW1 and PW2 shows that both are not eye witnesses and statements given by both of them come in the purview of hearsay evidence, which has no value - Prosecutrix was not examined before trial Court as she was dead at that time - Charge of offence u/s 366 IPC not proved -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304B-- Dowry death - Oral statements of PWs and documentary evidence in the shape of letters written by deceased to her father not supported prosecution case - There is no inference of any demand of dowry in such letter as well - Prosecution failed to prove either demand of dowry or that any such demand..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 149, 148-- Murder - Recovery of blood stained sticks and tabbal - No evidence on record to show that blood on articles recovered were stained with human blood and more particularly with blood of same blood group as that of deceased - FSL report shows that said blood stains were disintegrated and their origin..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 15-- Recovery of 1 Qtl. 20 kg chura poppy heads - Accused acquitted as : (i) Presence of DSP at the spot highly doubtful as this witness is not examined in Court and except for the recovery memo, he has not signed any other document; (ii) Presence of independent witness at the spot also doubtful; (iii)..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Easements Act, 1882, Section 52, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 105, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 6-- License or lease - Defendant granted license to plaintiff to carry on business of selling jewellery and handicrafts within hotel lobby - No interest created in respect of shop by defendant in favour of plaintiff - Plaintiff was not in exclusive possession of suit premises - Placement of shop in..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 323, 504, 506, 452, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)(X)-- Offence u/ss 323, 504, 506, 452 IPC and S.3(1)(X) of SC/ST Act - Complainant and his two witnesses were present on the spot at the time of occurrence - There is no exaggeration, material contradiction or embellishment in statement of all those three witnesses - Medical report is also in consonance..........

Showing : 91-100 of 6991 Results