Showing : 1921-1930 of 3986 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 8, Rule 10-- Written statement - Non filing within time fixed - Pronouncement of judgment - Court to go into maintainability of suit particularly when suit is instituted by a firm and this fact is brought to the notice of Court that suit by un unregistered partnership firm is not maintainable...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 446-- Accused absented - Surety remained absent despite service of notice - Penalty of Rs.50, 000/- imposed on surety - Penalty reduced to Rs.30, 000/- as there was no allegations that surety connived with accused so as to facilitate his abscondance - No evidence on record that surety had a remote scent..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Notice - Demand of Rs.75, 000/- whereas as per cheque respondent is liable to pay only Rs.70, 000/- - Held, same not fatal to the case of complainant...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378(4)-- Application u/s 378(4) - Must be accompanied by an appeal or a copy thereof which is proposed to be filed - Once leave is granted appeal shall be numbered and notice can be ordered without the requirement of such appeal being called before the Bench for admission...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Notice - Sent through e-mail - A notice demanding payment of amount under a dishonoured cheque can be sent electronically as well - No format is prescribed in respect of demand notice...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Two cheques - Accused making payment in respect of one cheque - Accused failed to make payment in respect of second cheque within 15 days of demand notice - Conviction upheld...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(2), 13(1)(d)-- Two accused named in FIR - Police filing report against one accused only - Magistrate summoning one accused only against whom final report u/s 173 Cr.P.C. is filed - Magistrate must give notice to the informant and provide him an opportunity to be heard at the time of consideration of the report..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Filing of complaint - Limitation for - Held, payee has got a right to send cheque to bank for a number of times he pleases during period of its validity - Limitation period for sending notice would start only from date of receipt of last information regarding non payment of..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint - Date of service of notice - Failure to mention - Maintainability - Held, if postal acknowledgment had not been received by complainant and so if actual date of service of notice could not be mentioned in complaint that would not render complaint not maintainable...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138(c)-- Dishonour of cheque - Issuance of notice - Mentioning or no, mentioning of time for payment of dishonored amount - Held, statutory time of 15 days has been provided in clause (C) of proviso to S.138 of the Act and if any other period is mentioned in notice or no period is mentioned in notice, the..........

Showing : 1921-1930 of 3986 Results