Showing : 1721-1730 of 4470 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Wakf Act, 1954, Section 56, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 106(3)-- - Courts can grant lesser relief than claimed, in the facts and circumstances of the case - In suit for possession along with structure, appellate court decreed suit for possession, directing defendants to hand over possession of the plots leased, after removing the malba which belong to the..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 15, 24A-- Appeal - Limitation - Banking service - Loan - To young unemployed youth under Prime Minister's Rozgar Yojna - First instatlment of loan for Rs. 20,000/ - paid to the respondent complainant - Second instalment of loan amounting to Rs. 27,000/ - for working capital DD issued to dealer for supply of..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 379, 420, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Prosecution allegation that petitioner in connivance with co-accused prepared fake cheque with an intention to cheat complainant - FIR lodged u/ss 379, 420 IPC - Complainant member of Co-operative Society and was issued a cheque book which was in possession of Secretary, co-accused - Cheque..........
PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Insurance Policy-- Lapse of policy - Deficiency in service - Compensation - Due to inadvertent mistake of the officials of respondent No. 1 premium receipt was not received and the amount was kept on extra credit amount - Once mistake had come to their notice the respondents deposited the amount in the appellants..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 9, 11-- Acquisition of land - Compensation - Acquisition challenged on the ground that notice u/s 9(3) not served - Held, provision of S.9(3) is not mandatory and not fatal to the acquisition - Even otherwise notice in the instant case was affixed on the land of the appellant which satisfied the..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913, Section 19-- Provision of S.19 of the Act is mandatory - In order to defeat the right of the pre-emptor, law has been enacted in such a fashion that before the property is sold, in order to avoid a litigation in the Court, a notice u/s 19 of the Act is required to be served by the Vendor to the other co-sharer..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A-- Limitation - Insurance claim - Bankers Indemnity Policy - Indemnification of embezzled amount - Acts of embezzlement could not have been detected in an institutional matter immediately after those were committed - As and when the embezzlement came to light it was immediately brought to the notice..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-Second Proviso - For applicability of the provision of O.9.R.13 Second Proviso the defendant should have notice of the date of hearing and also should have sufficient time to put in appearance - In the instant case in another suit plaintiff disclosed the fact of pendency of instant suit but did not..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Guidelines for Assistance, National Sport Federation's, 2001-- Clauses 2, 5 3, Para 1 2, 10 - Disciplinary sanction - Suspension of Indian Hockey Federation - Withdrawal of recognition - Disaffiliation of Indian Hockey Federation - Principles of natural justice - The relevant provision of MOA of the IOA envisage that any disaffiliation of an NSF has to be..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994, Section 76, 89, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 5, Rule 17-- Election to the post of Sarpanch - Notice sent to Panches by Presiding Officer - Two members refused to accept notice and thus assumed to be served - Meeting held and respondent elected Sarpanch - Held, refusal does not amount to service of notice - O.5.R.17 CPC states that in case of refusal,..........

Showing : 1721-1730 of 4470 Results