Showing : 1781-1790 of 4277 Results

KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Section 13(2)-- There is no bar to issue a corrected/fresh notice u/s 13(2) of the Act after receipt of objections u/s 13(3-A) of the Act...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 446-- Forfeiture of surety bond - Issue of show cause notice u/s 446 Cr.P.C. - Held, it is the duty of court to give notice to person whose bond is or has been forfeited, calling upon him either to pay the penalty or to show cause why it should not be paid - Issuance of such notice is mandatory...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 216-- Alteration/addition of charge - Allegations of mental cruelty u/s 498-A IPC - Period of cruelty confined before she was sent to parental home from matrimonial home - Application for alteration of charge that extent of period of cruelty continued even after she was sent at her parental home, on the..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section (3), 13-- New building - Suit filed within 10 years of construction of shop after issuing legal notice u/s 106 TPA - Rent Act not applicable due to new construction and shop being not situated within the notified Area or Municipal area - No substantial question of law involved - Appeal dismissed...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 441, 446-- Personal bond - Forfeiture of - Requirement of notice - Held, it was obligatory on court to give a notice calling upon appellant to pay penalty or show cause as to why it should not be paid - Without doing so, it was not open to court to impose penalty and recover same...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 5, Rule 20-- Substituted service - Can be ordered only when Court is satisfied that either the defendant is purposefully avoiding receipt of summons or having regard to the facts of the case it is not possible to serve the notice - Substituted service cannot be ordered merely on the ground that premises was..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - To constitute the offence, ingredients required to be fulfilled are : (i) a person must have drawn a cheque on an account maintained by him in a bank for payment of a certain amount of money to another person from out of that account; (ii) The cheque should have been issued..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 1(3), 13-- New building - Exemption from applicability of Rent Act - Defendant failed to prove that shop was constructed in 1994 and not in 1996 - Defendant failed to prove that shop was given on rent for more than 10 years prior to filing of the suit as such Rent Act is applicable - Tenancy was terminated..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 11-- Arbitrator - Appointment - Arbitration agreement - Construction of contract - (i) the terms of the articles of agreement will prevail over the terms of Notice inviting Tenders for Works and (ii) the term contained in the cyclostyled attachment to the printed form of articles of agreement will..........
JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Notice - Demand of Rs.90, 000/- whereas cheque amount was Rs.60, 000/- - Demand was not of cheque amount - Demand not made in terms of mandate of Act - Notice drafted by the Advocate - But Advocate not examined as witness to prove the contents of the said notice - Held,..........

Showing : 1781-1790 of 4277 Results