Showing : 1941-1950 of 4470 Results

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 190(1)-- Cognizance - Meaning of - Held, word "cognizance" has no esoteric or mystic significance in criminal law or procedure - It merely means `become aware of' and when used with reference to a Court or Judge, `to take notice judicially'...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Section 2(c), 11, 12-- Notice for contempt - Contemner tendering unconditional apology when his defence was rejected - Held, an apology is not a weapon of defence to purge the guilty of their defence - It cannot be termed as unconditional apology and cannot be accepted...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 58-- False case registered by SHO under NDPS Act - Accused acquitted - SHO registered false case at the instance of Tehsildar who wanted son of accused to abandon his rights over 75 kanals of land - SHO & Tehsildar convicted - Notice sent on quantum of punishment - Both of them filing petition u/s 482..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 16(c)-- Specific performance - Readiness and willingness - Plaintiff did not make any efforts to get sale deed executed in his favour - No notice was ever served upon defendant which may not be necessary requirement and a mandatory exercise - Yet it has to be independently inferred from facts of case..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Haryana Co-operative Societies Act, 1984, Section 124-- Notice - Society engaged in business of stone crusher and not connected with leasing or financing - Loan taken by society and not returned - Cannot be described as 'acts touching the business of the society' though it falls under the terminology 'in the course of business of the society' -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Notice - 30 days - Use of words in the provision is `within' and not `from' - Intimation from bank received on 3.12.2003 and notice issued on 2.1.2004 - Held, notice was issued on 31st day and not within 30 days from the date of receipt of intimation from bank - Complaint not..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Exparte decree - Setting aside - No sufficient cause shown for setting aside the exparte judgment and decree - A party served with summons at the commencement of the hearing of the suit is not required to be served with subsequent notice, which was necessitated because that party has chosen to..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f) , 2(1)(g)-- Housing - Tenements - Defects in construction - Deficiency in service - During tenancy period defects in construction brought to the notice of the petitioners - The State Commission has not passed any final order giving directions to the petitioners to rectify the defects/removes deficiency or to..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonor of cheque - Notice - Received back with endorsement of refusal - Held, presumption of valid service of notice can be raised even when a notice is received back with an endorsement that the party has refused to accept it...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonor of cheque - Insufficient funds - Two notices issued - Limitation starts to run from the date of receipt of former notice by the drawer and not from subsequent date of receipt of later notice by him...........

Showing : 1941-1950 of 4470 Results