Showing : 31-35 of 35 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 8, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17-- Personal appearance ordered - Lawyer filed memo on the adjourned date - Case dismissed U.O.9.R.8 - Not proper - Court could either adjourn the case subject to costs or to proceed under Order 17 CPC - At the most Court could direct the counsel to file regular power of attorney on the next date of..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9, 8-- Suit for declaration to be owner in possession and injunction restraining defendant from dispossessing or interfering in possession and by amendment challenge to sale - deed in favour of defendant - Dismissal of earlier suit in default under Order 9 Rule 8 - New cause of action will not be made..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1993
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 8, Rule 5, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Judgment when pronounced U.O.8 R.5, cannot be equated with an exparte decree and application U.O.9 R.13 for setting aside the same is not maintainable...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1993
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9, 8, 11-- Rr.14, 21 - Non compliance of directions U.O.11.R.14 - Suit dismissed - Plaintiff not present when suit was called out - Dismissal is U.O.9 R.8 - Application U.O.9 R.9 is maintainable...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1987
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 8, Rule 10, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Decree passed U.O.8 R.10 as the defendant failing to file the written statement - petition U.O.9 R.13 is maintainable...........

Showing : 31-35 of 35 Results