Showing : 911-920 of 1413 Results

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 90, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Auction sale - Setting aside - Limitation is 60 days - Time begins to run from the date of sale - Process of moving an application U.O.21.R.90 has to precede the confirmation of sale - Provision of S.5 Limitation Act is not applicable to an application under O.21 CPC...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 90-- Auction sale - Setting aside - Failure to state the existence of a well and mango tree in the sale proclamation - J.D. was present through Advocate when sale proclamation was settled - No such objection was raised at that stage by J.D. - Held, J.D. is prohibited from raising that objection as..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Provision of S.5 Limitation Act is not applicable to an application under O.21 CPC...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 99, 100, 101, 102, 103-- Execution - Decree for possession - Dispossession of a person other than J.D. - Restoration of possession - A person who is dispossessed of any property whether it is covered under decree or beyond the decree is entitled to make an application making grievance of such dispossession and seek for..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 99, 100, 101, 102, 103-- Execution - Decree for possession - Dispossession of a person other than J.D. - Restoration of possession - Application is to be decided like a suit - An opportunity is to be provided to the applicant to prove his case - Unless procedure prescribed for disposal of suit is followed, claim of..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 22-- Execution within two years - Option is given to Court to give or not to give notice to J.D. - However, once notice is ordered to be given to J.D., withdrawing of same at the instance of D.H. on the ground of long delay in litigation and ordering delivery of possession without hearing other side is..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 29-- Execution - Warrant of possession issued - Stay cannot be granted merely on the ground that a suit has been filed for setting aside the judgment and decree...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10(2), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 11-- Execution - Impleading of a party - There is no bar to implead a person who has got an interest even in the execution proceedings...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47, Order 21, Rule 35-- Execution - Decree for specific performance - Court executing decree can direct delivery of possession even if there is no specific direction to that effect in decree as granting of relief of possession is incidental to conveyance executed in favour of D.H...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 58-- Claim petition - Limitation - No particular period is prescribed for filing the claim petition - Court can entertain a claim petition subject to restrictions mentioned in Clauses (a) and (b) of the Proviso...........

Showing : 911-920 of 1413 Results