Showing : 81-90 of 113 Results

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 4(2)-- Advocate - Fee - Bank paid 50% fee at the time of filing plaint - Vakalath terminated during pendency of suit - Court directed that Advocate is entitled to 25% of fee and directed to return the balance of excess received from Bank - Circular instructions issued by Bank are binding on Bank and..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 2, 4-- General power of attorney holder - Has no right of audience - Not entitled to plead and argue - Power to plead on behalf of a party in judicial proceedings vests only with the pleader...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 2, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 118-- Power of attorney holder - Pronote - Execution - Proof - Plaintiff not appearing as a witness - Power of attorney was present at the time of execution of pronote and receipt - Held, power of attorney holder is competent in the circumstances of the case to depose regarding execution of pronote and..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 2-- Evidence Act, Section 118 - Right of holder of power-of-attorney to prove transaction - Power-of-attorney holder present when transaction had taken place i.e. pronote and receipt executed - Competent to depose regarding execution of pronote and receipt as well as receipt of money - Plea that..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 4(2)-- 'No instructions' - Before dismissal of suit Court to issue notice to the party - Counsel continues to represent party until he is permitted to withdraw in writing...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 4(2)-- 'No instructions' - Prayer to be made in writing and before granting leave to withdraw from the case Court to ensure that the party on whose behalf the counsel was appearing has knowledge of such withdrawal from the case...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 2-- Power of attorney holder - Is a competent witness and is entitled to appear as such and his statement in Court cannot be ignored merely because he appears as Attorney and not as a witness...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 2-- Power of attorney - Non appearance of plaintiff as a witness - His power of attorney appearing in witness box in capacity of power of attorney holder - Held, his evidence cannot be refused to be taken into consideration on ground of non appearance of plaintiff...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 2, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 118-- Power of attorney holder - Plea of fraud - It is the party in person who can bring the true facts on record - Moreover, an attorney authorised for various specific purposes but not for appearing as a witness of the person authorising him, cannot appear as a witness as well on his behalf...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 2, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 118-- Power of attorney holder - Witness - Can be examined as a witness on behalf of the party - There is no express bar made in the provisions of C.P.C. to debar the power of attorney to be examined as a witness on behalf of the parties to the proceedings. 1998(3) Civil Court Cases 539 (Raj.) not..........

Showing : 81-90 of 113 Results