LawMirror.com

Results of op

Showing : 351-360 of 1126 Results

RAJASTHAN STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, JAIPUR

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Carrier service - Contract for courier service is made between the complainant and OP No. 3 for carrying a parcel of jewellery to Hongkong who is agent of OP No 2 - Since there is no contract with OP No.2 the status of the complainant qua OP No. 2 could be that of third party - The complainant acquires no right against OP..........

RAJASTHAN STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, JAIPUR

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Carrier service - Deficiency in service - Insurance claim - Right of insurer on payment - In case the payment is made by the Insurance Company OP No. 1 to the complainant, it is free to proceed against the carriers OP Nos. 2 and 3 for the recovery of the sum payable by them to the complainant insured in accordance with law...........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Medical negligence -- Eye surgery - OP Nos. 1&2 are Ophthalmologists surgeons who are specialists - There is no doubt that they being qualified and specialists and possessing requisite skills - Complainant No. 2 who is father of complainant No. 1, delayed in taking complainant No. 1 to the specialist immediately - Nearly 4 - 5 hours had passed after the injury and the boy..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Medical negligence -- Delivery case - Death during delivery - Res ipsa loqutur - Compensation - Wife of complainant was healthy woman aged 39 years with all parameters being normal, died due to anesthetic dosage given to her and the Anesthetist did not reverse it properly - From the operation theater onwards patient's conditions just remained critical and deteriorated as..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Vehicle finance -- Repossession of vehicle for nonpayment of installments - OP Bank had gone through the proper procedure with regard to the repossession of the vehicle due to default in payment of installments - There is no deficiency on the part of OP - The complainant had failed to establish her case that the vehicle had been forcibly repossessed - Vehicle purchased for..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Medical negligence -- Compensation - Eye surgery - Cataract in Eye - No allegation that the OP doctor has intentionally against the will of the petitioner/complainant conducted the cataract operation to cause any loss or injury to the complainant - Just because the complainant has not favourably responded to the treatment because of some other complication, it would be..........

CHHATTISGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, RAIPUR

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Bankers Indemnity policy -- Contract of insurance - Vague contract - Insurance claim - Repudiation - Exclusion clause - There is discrepancy in the terms of policy - On the one hand OP undertakes to indemnify under the policy up to the limit of insurance cover for acts and omissions of the employees, which includes negligent acts and omissions but on the other hand, under..........

CHHATTISGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, RAIPUR

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Insurance claim -- Compensation - Interest - Complainant alleged loss of stocks of Sarees in fire to the tune of Rs. 67 lacs - Joint inspection report of Surveyor, investigator and the complainant finding loss of 1800 sarees instead of 3000 sarees as claimed by the complainant - Average price of Rs. 900 each sarees also agreed - Insurance company making payment of loss of..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Medical negligence -- Compensation - Lapse in ensuring proper preservation of the biopsy tissues of the complainant before sending the sample for HPE - Not a mere human error - Suppressing from the complainant the fact of the first biopsy having failed due to negligence of the OP 1 staff concerned as well as not firmly advising a second biopsy soon thereafter -..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2009
Details

Medical negligence -- Compensation - Premature delivery - Retinopathy of Prematurity - Development of - Baby kept in hospital for 24 days - OP Nos. 3 and 4 have seen the baby after the discharge at home and at the clinic and yet no such advice for screening ROP has been given - OPs have failed in their duty of care by not writing anything in the discharge summary what is..........

Showing : 351-360 of 1126 Results