Showing : 41-50 of 1059 Results

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b)-- Revisional jurisdiction - Concurrent findings - Insurance claim - Repudiation - Non disclosure about previous policies - Policies were issued within 2 years period before the death of the life assured - There are no allegations of pre - existing ailment or any complaints about health of the life..........
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Insurance claim-- Repudiation - Suppression of material fact - At the time of revival of policy in the proposal form life assured had not disclosed that he was suffering from Rheumatic Heart Disease - Appellant - OP was justified in repudiating the claim - District Forum passed the impugned order allowing the claim..........
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Insurance claim-- Repudiation - Suppression of material fact - At the time of revival of policy in the proposal form life assured had not disclosed that he was suffering from lungs carcinoma with pulmonary T.B. - Appellant - OP was justified in repudiating the claim - District Forum passed the impugned order..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Medical negligence-- Principle of res ipsa loquitur - Hysterectomy operation - After removal of sutures blood oozed and abdomen burst - Held to be a fit case where the principle of res ipsa loquitur would be fully applicable - State Commission was right in holding the OP negligent in the matter - See no reason to..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Medical negligence-- Principle of res ipsa loquitur - Hysterectomy operation - After removal of sutures blood oozed and abdomen burst - Held to be a fit case where the principle of res ipsa loquitur would be fully applicable - State Commission was right in holding the OP negligent in the matter - See no reason to..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Insurance policy-- Insurance claim - Re - instatement charges - Loss already occurred - There is no question of further continuance of policy - Charges for the said policies at the inception by way of premium for the whole year was Rs. 28,429 while the OP has deducted a sum of Rs. 1,27,181/ - for the remaining eight..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Insurance policy-- Insurance claim - Re - instatement charges - Loss already occurred - There is no question of further continuance of policy - Charges for the said policies at the inception by way of premium for the whole year was Rs. 28,429 while the OP has deducted a sum of Rs. 1,27,181/ - for the remaining eight..........
H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d)-- Consumer - Deficiency in service - Compensation - Second complaint - Maintainability of complaint - Vehicle was given for repair to the respondent being authorized service center for Maruti car - The car had completely destroyed in fire due to negligence of the respondent - Complainant - appellant..........
RAJASTHAN STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, JAIPUR
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), Post Office Act, Section 6-- Registered letter - Containing Bank draft not reaching destination - Deficiency in service - Compensation - Relying upon Section 6 of the Post Office Act plea by appellant - OP that its liability could not be more than Rs. 100/ - repelled - Appellant has not come out with his version as to where..........
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, RAJASTHAN
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), Post Office Act, Section 6-- Registered letter - Containing Bank draft not reaching destination - Deficiency in service - Compensation - Relying upon Section 6 of the Post Office Act plea by appellant - OP that its liability could not be more than Rs. 100/ - repelled - Appellant has not come out with his version as to where..........

Showing : 41-50 of 1059 Results