Showing : 51-60 of 1059 Results

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Vehicle finance-- Forcible re - possession of vehicle by appellant - OP - For neglecting to pay the installments on due dates - 26 installments out of 36 installments already paid when the vehicle was repossessed in exercise of the right under Clause 15 of the agreement between the parties - No show cause notice..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), Insurance Act, 1938, Section 64UM-- Insurance policy - Stock broking business - Business peril - Insurance claim - Repudiation - Loss caused by business peril - There is ample evidence of lack of even ordinary good faith, leave alone utmost good faith in the conduct of the complainant - it did not comply with the regulatory..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Insurance claim-- Surveyors' report - Deduction from the net assessed loss on the strength of ' Cause Factors' - The damages to the insured molasses contained in the pits not disputed and the extent of loss caused to the complainant is also not disputed - What weighed with the Surveyor in recommending payment of..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Vehicle finance-- Forcible re - possession of vehicle by appellant - OP - For neglecting to pay the installments on due dates - 26 installments out of 36 installments already paid when the vehicle was repossessed in exercise of the right under Clause 15 of the agreement between the parties - No show cause notice..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), Insurance Act, 1938, Section 64UM-- Insurance policy - Stock broking business - Business peril - Insurance claim - Repudiation - Loss caused by business peril - There is ample evidence of lack of even ordinary good faith, leave alone utmost good faith in the conduct of the complainant - it did not comply with the regulatory..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Insurance claim-- Surveyors' report - Deduction from the net assessed loss on the strength of ' Cause Factors' - The damages to the insured molasses contained in the pits not disputed and the extent of loss caused to the complainant is also not disputed - What weighed with the Surveyor in recommending payment of..........
THE UNION TERRITORY CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 13(3B), 17(1)(b)-- Striking off defence - For not filing reply to the complaint after availing several opportunities and for non - payment of costs - Held that for the palpable negligence and the dilatory tactics adopted by the OP he could be burdened with heavy costs - An opportunity should be afforded to the..........
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 13(3B), 17(1)(b)-- Striking off defence - For not filing reply to the complaint after availing several opportunities and for non - payment of costs - Held that for the palpable negligence and the dilatory tactics adopted by the OP he could be burdened with heavy costs - An opportunity should be afforded to the..........
THE UNION TERRITORY CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 15, 26-- Frivolous complaint - Costs - Banking service - Bank loan - Interest - Floating rate - EMI - Increase in term of EMI - The complainant very well knew that as per the agreement/documents, the rate of interest, on the loan which was taken by him was floating and the EMIs and the period of loan could..........
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 15, 26-- Frivolous complaint - Costs - Banking service - Bank loan - Interest - Floating rate - EMI - Increase in term of EMI - The complainant very well knew that as per the agreement/documents, the rate of interest, on the loan which was taken by him was floating and the EMIs and the period of loan could..........

Showing : 51-60 of 1059 Results