LawMirror.com

Results of op

Showing : 771-780 of 1126 Results

GUJARAT STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AHMEDABAD

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g), Contract Act, 1872, Section 65 -- Telephone directory - Publishing of - Contract became impossible of performance as permission not granted by the Telecommunication Department for publishing of directory - The OP's legally bound to render service to the complainants namely to refund the amount paid by the complainants when..........

GUJARAT STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AHMEDABAD

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Medical negligence -- Costs - Material facts suppressed by the complainant from the learned Forum - No negligence of the OP established - Held that very filing of complaint against first OP doctor clearly unwarranted and uncalled for - Findings of the District Forum in dismissing the complaint with costs of Rs. 5,000/- upheld...........

GUJARAT STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AHMEDABAD

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2) -- Territorial Jurisdiction - Medical negligence - Every part of cause of action occurred at surat - Merely because the complainant came to know about the alleged default/ imperfection on the part of opponent doctor while she had been at her parental home at Rajkot - It cannot be said that any part of cause of action against the..........

GUJARAT STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AHMEDABAD

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2),(c) -- Territorial jurisdiction - Medical negligence - Every part of cause of action occurred at Surat - Merely because the complainant came to know about the alleged default/imperfection on the part of the OP doctor while she had been at her parental home at Rajkot it cannot be said that any part of cause of action against OP..........

WEST BENGAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CALCUTTA

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Medical negligence -- Allegation that patient died of serum jaundice due to sheer negligence and lack of professional knowledge of OP's - The petitioners have utterly failed to substantiate the allegations - The condition of the patient was very critical even on the date of admission - Series of investigation were undertaken, blood transfusion done, but even than life..........

DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g),14(1),(d) -- Banking service - Cheque - The amount not credited in the account of the complainant and credited after two years after the complaint was filed - Held to be deficiency in service - Order of the District Forum directing the appellant/OP to pay interest @ 12% p.a. on the cheque amount from 15.8.2000 to 8.10.2002..........

UTTAR PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, LUCKNOW

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Life Insurance Policy -- Revival of policy - Money Back Policy purchased under table-75 in 1988 - Premium paid till December,1990 - Complainant met with an accident on 10.10.1993 in which he lost two limbs permanently - Application for revival of policy submitted on 29.3.1995 - Decision taken by OP-appellants on 29.2.1996 to revive the policy with several conditions and..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(f) -- Laser printer - Manufacturing defect - District Forum appointed Expert who reported that there is no manufacturing defect - The problem arose due to lack of knowledge and experience on the part of the appellant complainant to operate the printer - The evidence placed on record by the OP's clearly go to show that the goods..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Insurance claim -- Burglary and House breaking Policy - Repudiation of claim - Ground that on account of cyclone on 29.10.99 mob looted the factory by entering forcibly on 31.10.99 and the loss not covered by Fire policy and the loss is not covered under Burglary policy due to exclusion clause - Loss assessed at Rs. 34,95,755/- by Surveyor - Held that not even remotely..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g),14(1),(d) -- Tubewell electricity connection - Instruction No. 26 of the Sales Manual of the Board envisaged provision of connection within two months after issue of demand note - Electric connection not given even after expiry of three to five years - District Forum allowing complaints and directing release of connection..........

Showing : 771-780 of 1126 Results