Showing : 41-50 of 1380 Results

KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 13, 15, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Ex parte decree of divorce - Remarriage during pendency of application to set aside ex parte decree - Remarriage after receipt of notice of application to set aside ex parte decree - An incapacity for second marriage for a certain period does not have effect of treating former marriage as..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 7-- Setting aside ex-parte order - Appeal against dismissal of application - Prayer for setting aside ex-parte order made during pendency of suit U.O.9.R.7 of CPC and not after its disposal U.O.9.R.13 - Therefore, an appeal preferred against order passed in relation to an application U.O.9.R.7 of CPC,..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 7-- Ex parte proceedings - Setting aside - Defendant No.4 refused to accept summons and therefore served by affixing of summons at his residence - Delay of 13 years in not moving application U.O.9.R.7 CPC and admitted relationship of defendant No.4 with defendant No.2, who was served summon in 2005..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Ex parte divorce decree - Setting aside - Application to set aside ex parte decree not filed within 30 days of knowledge of ex parte decree - Meanwhile husband remarried - Where a party has solemnized a second marriage, issue concerning ex parte decree has to be decided keeping in view the..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Condonation of delay - Application for restoration filed after delay of 18 months - Appellant was aware about dismissal of suit still he knowingly failed to file application for restoration within prescribed period - Application rightly rejected...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Condonation of delay - Delay of about 3 years 8 months - Defendant corporation is public sector undertaking and huge public money is involved in the case - Ex parte decree set aside subject to payment of costs of Rs.50,000/-...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 7-- Ex parte proceedings - Dismissal of application to set aside ex parte proceedings - Defendant has right to participate in the proceedings to cross examine the plaintiff or his witnesses and if necessary to lead evidence in rebuttal...........
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 9, Rule 13-- Exparte order - Setting aside - Tribunal rejected application of petitioner on ground that despite knowledge of case pending against him he has gone to work at place `M' - Reason given by Tribunal is not justified as petitioner failed to contest proceedings before Tribunal due to communal clashes..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 4, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Condonation of delay of 513 days - Plea of illness and non intimation of dismissal by counsel - Said plea not substantiated by plaintiff - Even delay of 513 days in approaching Court not explained by plaintiff - Application for restoration of suit rightly..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 8, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 43, Rule 1(c)-- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Defendant duly represented and it was plaintiff who did not appear - Order of dismissal of suit is U.O.9.R.8 CPC - Rejection of application for restoration of suit is covered U.O.43.R.1(c) CPC - Factual mistake committed by lower Appellate Court that..........

Showing : 41-50 of 1380 Results