Showing : 221-230 of 534 Results

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Necessary party - Suit for possession - Held, when none of the persons has any right, title or interest in suit properties and mutation entries in their names were bogus and fraudulent, they would not be necessary parties to suit...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10, Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, Section 118(5)- - Necessary party - Suit for possession - Contention of defendant that property was mortgaged with co-operative bank hence bank was necessary party - Held, if at all bank had any cause or reason to proceed against suit property that cannot be subject-matter of suit - Under provisions of the Act of..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleading of a party - Eviction proceedings - During pendency of appeal against eviction order an application filed for impleadment of party to the proceedings on ground that applicant is a co-owner - Co-owner is not a necessary party in an eviction petition - Order dismissing application calls..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Adding or removing defendants - Court has suo motu power to add and struck off defendants where-ever it feels necessary keeping in view pleadings and documents brought before Court...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Amendment of plaint - Impleadment of vendees - It came to notice of petitioner/plaintiff from written statement that land has already been sold - Immediately thereafter, petitioner moved an application for amendment of plaint and impleadment of vendees - Held, application for amendment as well as..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleading a party - Suit for specific performance - Suit filed against father of applicant who was proceeded ex parte - Son seeking impleadment on the ground that father did not have an indefeasible right to sell the ancestral property and thus applicant having right by birth - In a suit for..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 19-- Impleadment of subsequent purchaser - Suit for specific performance - Court is to determine whether purchaser claims title under vendor of plaintiff or he claims a title independent of or adverse to the title of vendor - Impleadment is permissible where applicant claims under the vendor of..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleading a party - Suit for specific performance - Transferee pendente lite - Law as to - (i) a contract of specific performance is enforceable against the parties to the contract including those who are claiming under them; (ii) It is not enforceable against a subsequent transferee for value..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleading a party - Suit for specific performance - Transferee pendente lite - It is always proper to implead transferee pendente lite on an application of the plaintiff who is dominus litis...........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleadment as party - Rejection of application - Validity - - Construction of maternity center on disputed land - Issues involved in suit relate to claim of opposite party No.1 as lessee over suit land - Petitioners can have no say in such matter - Petitioners though social activists and..........

Showing : 221-230 of 534 Results