Showing : 441-450 of 986 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 9-- Non-joinder of necessary parties - Held, in case of natural or intestate succession, all the issues of four sisters of testator would also be entitled to equal share with plaintiffs and defendants No.1 to 5 in property of testator - However, the aforesaid issues of four sisters have not been..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleadment of co-owner of vendor - Specific performance suit - Exercise of power by Court - Held, other co-owner, who is sought to be impleaded as additional defendant, can be impleaded as a proper party and the issue can be examined whether plaintiff is entitled to specific performance of..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleadment of party - Eviction suit - Plaintiffs filed suit precisely asserting that relationship of landlord and tenant exists between himself and defendant "B" - "B" denied such a plea and asserted "M" to be tenant - Application filed by "M" U.O.1.R.10 CPC seeking his impleadment in suit..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10(2)-- Impleadment of party in appeal - Specific performance of contract - Specific issue framed with regard to necessary party having not been impleaded - Suit dismissed on that ground - Plaintiff sought impleadment of party in appeal - Held, since trial of suit is complete, consequence of addition..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Suit filed by tenant to restrain owner from evicting him except in due course of law - Bank (second creditor) took symbolic possession of property and admitted it to public auction - Application filed under O.1.R.10 CPC to implead bank and District Magistrate in the suit filed by the tenant..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10, Succession Act, 1925, Section 372-- Necessary party - Application for grant of succession certificate - Application filed by widow and children of deceased - Petitioner sought impleadment as intervener claiming himself elder brother of deceased testator and denying that applicants are widow and children of deceased - Held,..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 44C, Order 1, Rule 10, Orissa- - Election petition - Necessary party - Impleadment of - Applicability of O.1.R.10 CPC - Held, when S.44-C of the Act clearly states as to who are to be added as parties in an election dispute, the Court trying the election dispute or the appellate Court, cannot exercise jurisdiction like a civil..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10(2)-- Impleading of a party - Suit for specific performance - Pendente lite purchaser - When party sought to be impleaded is not claiming any independent title and they are claiming title through one of the parties, they are necessary and proper party and they are liable to be impleaded as parties to..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 52-- Impleading of a party - Transferee pendente lite - Cannot be impleaded as a party to the suit...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 9-- If some persons are likely to be affected on account of setting aside a decision enuring to their benefit, the Court should not embark upon the consideration and the correctness of such decision in the absence of such persons...........

Showing : 441-450 of 986 Results