LawMirror.com

Results of o 17 r 2 civil procedure code

Showing : 21-30 of 88 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17, Rule 1, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 2 -..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17, Rule 2 -- Plaintiff when closes his evidence and defendant fails to appear then O.17.R.2 CPC is clearly attracted...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17, Rule 2, 3 -- Adjournment - Conduct of parties can always be looked into and if any of the parties are found instrumental in getting the proceedings delayed by adopting dilatory methods, the court below is at liberty to deny any such adjournment, which may result in installing the proceedings...........

PATNA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17, Rule 2, 3 -- Non-examination of material witnesses - Application of O.17.Rr.2, 3 - Only formal witnesses have been examined as no material witnesses could be examined by plaintiff and on date fixed further witnesses could not be produced for examination - Suit was dismissed U.O.17.Rr.3 of the Code after recording finding that no..........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17, Rule 2, 3, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9 -- Absence of party on date of hearing - Procedure to be followed - Applicability of R.2 & 3 of O.17 - Held, Rr.2 & 3 provides for distinct and different sets of circumstances - U/R.2, Court is empowered to dispose of suit in any one of the modes specified U.O.9.R.2 only when any of the..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 14, Rule 1, 2 -- Written statement - Amendment - Coupled with application for framing of additional issues - Applications not bona fide one - Not necessary for proper adjudication of the controversy in dispute - Dismissal of applications - Calls for no interference...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 4, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17, Rule 1, 2 -- Suit dismissed in default for want of prosecution - Dismissal in default amounts to dismissal U.O.9.R.3 and not U.O.17.R.2 CPC - Proper remedy for making an application is U.O.9.R.4 CPC...........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17, Rule 2 -- Dismissal of suit for default - Second suit on same cause - Bar as to - Plea that suit was barred U.O.9.R.9 CPC raised in second appeal - Contention of plaintiff that suit was dismissed for non appearance of both parties - Held, question whether suit was dismissed due to default of..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 3, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section , Order 17, Rule 2, 3 -- Evidence closed by order when no evidence was led inspite of repeated adjournments and decree granted - Application U.O.9.R.13 to set aside judgment and decree - Application dismissed by holding that application U.O.9.R.13 CPC is not maintainable and only remedy..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 1, 2, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, Limitation Act, 1963, Article 136 -- Execution - New item of property - Amendment of execution application or an application containing an alternative mode of execution or proceeding against a new item of property not already included in the pending execution petition - It is a fresh application for..........

Showing : 21-30 of 88 Results